A few years ago I was reading a book by Ivan Maisel about college football. In it were several lists. One was of “Most Underrated Rivalries.” At #1 was [COLOR=“Black”]South Carolina[/COLOR] - Clemson about which he wrote something along the lines of: “If there were a machine that could harness the energy behind a rivalry South Carolina - Clemson would make that machine tap dance.” At #2 he listed Was[COLOR=“DarkOrange”]hington[/COLOR] - Was[COLOR=“Gray”]hington State[/COLOR] (for the Apple Cup). I don’t remember exactly what his criteria were for listing rivalries there but don’t doubt Ivan Maisel! He had a story about and showed (at the front of that book) the letter he once got from Paul “Bear” Bryant that “proves” his college football bona fides. So there!
I insist that such a statement is no more than a matter of opinion. And in MY opinion [COLOR=“Yellow”]UM[/COLOR] vs. tO[COLOR=“Silver”]SU[/COLOR] is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY overrated.
That’s an interesting point. If you want to go to a big Midwestern university located in a small to medium sized college town, you have lots of pptions. If you want to go to one in a big city, and you don’t have the grades for Northwestern, tOSU is pretty much it. So you might expect those from the region whol want that lifestyle would tend to go there.
In the wild, however, I have not observed Ohio State fans to be notably more bohemian or sophisticated than their Big Ten peers.
Well, from the OP it appears you think the biggest rivalry would be the one that’s had the biggest impact on the national championship race in the recent past. Which I guess would probably be the Iron Bowl. And that’s certainly as valid a point of view as any other.
Actually, my point all along has been more along the lines of: “Who’s to say just what the ‘biggest’ (however one defines that) rivalry is? It might be [COLOR=“Yellow”]UM[/COLOR] vs. tO[COLOR=“Silver”]SU[/COLOR], and it might not be. But I don’t think a declarative statement can be made one way or another so I don’t understand why so many people consider it to be when there’s no real way of proving that.”
Agreed. That’s why I think in-state rivalries are the most intense.
I went to the Clemson/SC game a few years ago. It was 2016. Clemson won 56-7, I think. They really enjoy beating SC, whom they derisively refer to as “the chickens”.
With all respect due “The Civil War,” here’s some good stuff about the Was[COLOR=“DarkOrange”]hington[/COLOR] - Or[COLOR=“Yellow”]egon[/COLOR] football rivalry (which got a lot more “real” starting in 1994).
Lehigh–Lafayette (AKA “The Rivalry” ) is almost as old (1884). It is the most played college football rivalry. Plus they play American football, which is what I think the OP was asking).
Plus I think it probably has one of the highest ratios of “intensity of fan base” to “actual significance of the game”.
For those not from the area, those supporting Lafayette always list Lafayette first and those supporting Lehigh always list Lehigh first. Those who start with Lehigh are wrong.
Okay, but unless you’re from Alabama, how can you possibly know how strongly people from there feel about that rivalry? I’ve mentioned in this thread, before, how [COLOR=“Yellow”]UM[/COLOR] vs. tO[COLOR=“Silver”]SU[/COLOR] was never really on my radar when I was a kid, but at least I knew of it. I don’t think I knew anything about any “Iron Bowl” until after I got out of the navy. My point being that no matter how intense locals feel about a rivalry, if it doesn’t resonate with anybody outside of a given state or a given region, then how can it truly be considered a great rivalry from a nationwide perspective?