I need no smillies of any kind to tell you that you’re simply a mindless and minor irritant with a compulsive need to overcome your feelings of inferiority by butt-licking the Conservative Big Guns® here, i.e., Scylla and Sam “The American Kanadian” Stone. Of course your licking doesn’t stop there, as you’ll also readily get on your knees, and tongue brainless farts such as Duffer and Rune.
You’re scum. Simple as that.
As for **Scylla **and Sammyboy, they are actually worse than scum, for when politics at not at issue they actually appear to have a brain. OTOH, as most Internet bullies, I strongly suspect that their carefully cultivated Macho-Man ways would come to an abrupt end if it weren’t bytes we were trading. Assholes on a cyberego trip. Nothing more nothing less.
Meanwhile, to be sure, you’re not worthy of being scraped off the soles of William Jefferson Clinton’s shoes. Much less criticize tha man. Your complete dearth of knowledge when it comes to anything political (other thah Repugs good, Dems, suck) not only makes you utterly unprepared for the task bur it also exposes you for what you really are: an utter imbecil with no mind to call his own. IOW, a typical Bushbot, much to blame for the disgrateful situation your country currently finds itself in.
Not that I expect one word of what I’ve written to sink in into your brainless skull, but I felt it needed to be said.
Now, be a good boy and go find some right-wing ass to suck on. Not that you need my encouragement…
Cheese Louise, Red! Don’t keep it all bottled up, say what you really feel! None of these people actually rise at night to feed on the living. Heck, Sam, the Canadian Eagle likes Warren Zevon, there simply has to be hope for someone like that.
Get too uptight about this shit, companero, and you end up constipating your chi. Bummer.
Anyone ever tell you that you’re cute when you’re mad?
Of course, you’re even cuter when you get so riled that you become literally unintelligible, but still…
And on preview, I’d truly love to ‘exchange pleasantries’ with you IRL, too. (No threat intended, of course. Just matter of factly.) Of course, given the fact that I’ve seen pictures of you, I can’t imagine there’d be much of a threat there to begin with. :rolleyes:
Perhaps I need some clarification. I thought insulting the threads posters in toto and/or the overall tone of the thread was permissible, but not the insulting of individual posters. I thought I had even seen that explained by a moderator at one time. If I was indeed wrong in posting what I did, I’ll refrain from doing so again, but it was my belief at the time that such was permitted and I’d appreciate some official clarification on this rule.
See, this is the kind of shit that makes me question you so-called “even-handness,” and “nonpartisanship.”
For instance, did you happen to miss this post by Hentor shortly prior to yours?
I mean, really, John, why not simply come out clean and say what is almost always implied in your posts? Which is that Bush, despite a shortcoming here or there and/or a bunch of lies, is not that bad at all…compared to what a debacle a Democratic Presidency would have been.
'cuase you’ve gone past “defending the facts” by quite a few city blocks by now…
Interestingly, I didn’t take that to mean Republican politicians when I heard him say it because I didn’t think that many fit the description. I took it to me folks like Rush and Hannity and The Wicked Witch of the West (aka, Ann Coulter). It makes more sense that way, too, btw.
As for the comments about Bush’s neocons, I don’t know what that means. I assume in that instance he’s actually talking about people in governement, and not comentators like Bill Kristol.
We’ll have to agree to disagree, since I find “utter fabrication” to be a gross overstatement.
As a minor note, in post #273 tomndebb misattributed a quote to me that was actually yours.
Funny that, outside religious matters, I find Poly one of the keenest posters here. Thus, in my world, I would call that a “real smackdown” of the clearly partisan rightwing bullshit your OP is construed of.
Then again, you’ve got nothing ele to offer on this matter. That much is evidently clear.
So what if Chris Wallace didn’t ask Condi the exact same question that he asked Clinton. What does that prove? Nothing.
And say whatever you like about what you think I’m thinking, but you’re wrong. Show me on post I’ve ever made that says I think a Democratic Presidency would’ve been a debacle. Just because I don’t share your highly partisan view of things doesn’t mean I’m a fan of Bush. I am not, and I’ve said so repeatedly.
Sorry, Zoe, other than GD and The Pit, I hardly visit any other area of the SDMB (spend too much time here as it is, as I suspect is the case with many others).
Point being, all I’ve ever read from the poster in question, certainly holds true in my description of the man.
Lord knows he’s beem pummeled with facts (as in this very thread) and he simply and fecklessly lets them fly right over his vacuous head.
Again, sorry, Zoe, but I directing my comments to what I know of the man – nothing else. And I doubt finding a mutual affinity in movies, fashion, women and/or food, would make me change my mind about him.
Well, you see, Red, once upon a time in my callow youth, I actually tried real dialog here. It did not go well. For you see, failure to admit error of thought and subsequently to come around to the point of view of the ‘usual suspects’ around here merely resulted in endless pile-ons (piles-on? ) and accomplished nothing. So, after wasting countless hours and beating my head against the wall one time too many, I merely adopted the attitude that I’d just say whatever I wanted and let the chips fall where they may. And you know what has changed? Nothing! I still get called mindless and stupid and a Bushbot, simply because I don’t, you know, embrace the liberal way of thought.
You yourself give the lie to any notion of fairness and open-mindedness with your screed above which includes some of the most even-handed and fair-minded and agression-free conservative posters on this board. It doesn’t matter in the slightest how open to discussion and/or the facts they may be, they are conservatives and you differentiate very little in view of them vs. your view of me.
You are a would-be superior minded, hot-headed, irrational bigot, and virtually anyone not towing the party-line-according-to-Red gets assailed accordingly. If anyone around here is close-minded and shut off from dialog about the issues, it is you.
) and accomplished nothing. So, after wasting countless hours and beating my head against the wall one time too many, I merely adopted the attitude that I’d just say whatever I wanted and let the chips fall where they may. And you know what has changed? Nothing! I still get called mindless and stupid and a Bushbot, simply because I don’t, you know, embrace the liberal way of thought.