9/11 was unexpected but could possibly have been prevented if your lousy SoS had listened to Richard Clarke instead of getting him fired, and had read her fucking bulletins (“bin Laden determined to strike in US”). Millions of people around the world tried to get you to think twice about attacking Iraq and take a second look at the “evidence” of WMDs, but your insularity kept you from true leadership.
The members of Congress and other world leaders were looking at the bogus intelligence that YOU (and fucking Colin Powell) showed them! They all looked to YOU and trusted that YOU would be smart enough to weigh the true intelligence and look at all the angles before you forgot about Afghanistan, forgot about bin Laden, and acted like a drunk cowboy stumbling off to avenge Poppa.
You can’t change your legacy with a bunch of last-minute boo hoo, so sorry, damns. You’re hated or at least disliked by everyone who isn’t a right-wing loonball, and history will judge you harshly. Asshole.
Sometimes, I ALMOST feel sorry for him. Its like your bachelor brother in law deciding “no problem, I can watch your toddler triplets for the weekend” and then being totally unprepared for emergency room trips and blaming the neighbor for having that swingset anyway.
I think I misunderstood you. I thought you were saying that I should be glad I’m not hanging from a streetlight for being insolent to the president, but now I read it as HE should be glad he’s not hanging from a streetlamp because he’s a fucking lying, scumbag murderer.
Is he STILL fucking hallucinating that Iraq attacked us? Is he STILL claiming he went to war with Iraq due the attack on 9/11?
Now I’m gonna have to listen to the fucking interview – perhaps thet context will make clear that’s not what he meant. I hope so. But damn, I HATE listening to the guy – I haven’t been able to listen to his speeches for years. His idiocy just burns through, and it actually feels kinda painful.
It almost certainly would have been prevented had Bill Clinton, Richard Clarke, et. al killed Bin Laden when they had the opportunity to do so.
This from terrorist analyst Michael Scheuer on CBS’ Early Show:
“The former president seems to be able to deny facts with impugnity. Bin Laden is alive today because Mr. Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr. Richard Clarke refused to kill him,” he said.
Sorry, I don’t click links provided by right wing loonballs. In any case, even if you’re right, and being a right wing loonball I’d doubt you’re right about anything other than HTR, 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch, and it was HIS people who disregarded the warnings.
Bush and his supporters, including people like you, have been constantly yammering over the past 7 years that “9/11 changed everything.” Why, then, should we hold Clinton to the same level of responsibility regarding Bin Laden as we do Bush?
If 9/11 was indeed the massive watershed moment that Bush and his supporters have repeatedly claimed, then surely the effort to find and kill Bin Laden in the period after 9/11 should be weighed as more important than the period before.
Really?
From that link:
Yet according to Staff Statement No. 5, part of the 9/11 Commission Report: