Birkenstocks (no lesbian jokes, please)

Yesterday I made purchase of a pair of Birkenstock clogs, the goofy-looking polyurethane ones popular among medical folk. (Trust me, to the med student, quality footwear can mean the difference between a good day and a world of suck.)

My opinion, after wearing them around for a day or so–Jesus H. Christ in light syrup, are these ever comfortable. I can’t figure out exactly why, though–there doesn’t seem to be anything all that special about them. I keep thinking that I have always associated Birkenstock with quality shoes, and my impression may be colored by that association.

So am I a victim of excellent marketing, or do these people just make damn fine shoes?

Dr. J

Why can’t I make lesbian jokes? Descrimination!

Birks are more built for a person’s foot than most shoes- that is, they’re built for the natural shape. Also, the soles are made of better material.

Yes, I do own a pair.

They seem to be among the few shoe makers to realize that most people’s feet don’t come to a point. I have duck feet (wide at the toes) and I usually have to buy shoes that are too long in order for them to be wide enough. This may not be as big an issue with men’s feet, but that’s why I live in my Mephistos.

They may not be pretty, but damn, are they comfortable! I resisted for a long time, finally buying my first pair of sandals a couple years ago. Now I revel in their ugliness. I wear them almost exclusively, unless the weather forces me to switch to hiking boots. I also have a pair of purple gardening clogs.

My question: how in the hell do you all drive in them? Everyone I know drives in backless sandals and clogs. I can’t. They’d fall off my foot and cause me to have an accident.

I had fake Kmart Birks in high school and I testify-they WERE comfy, even if they weren’t real…

BTW, what’s the deal with Lesbians and Birkenstocks?
I never heard of a connection…

I have a pair of Clark’s sandals that are every bit as comfy, yet a whole lot more stylish. IIRC they make mens shoes also.

You may also want to try Doc Martens, they’re supposed to be awesome, though I was never able to get over the clunkyness (as a chick), I love 'em on men though.

Sue, I also have the Clarks sandals- They’re much more comfortable than Tevas IMHO but can be a bit slippery when wet.
As for shoes, I have a pair of Ecco hiking boots that are w/o a doubt the most comfortable shoes I have ever put on.
Period.
I have worn these shoes for 36+ hours straight; walking, climbing, fording streams, sliding down gravel escarpments scrambling for my life (another story), yet when I take them off, my feet feel just peachy! I wear them everywhere.
OTOH, the pair of Ecco dress shoes I own are particulerly uncomfortable but I believe this to be a combination of fluke and my feet being long accustomed to carpenters’ boots/gym shoes.

Your first day in your Birkenstocks and you’re ALREADY comfortable?

Hoooooo…wear them every day for the next week…by the time you break them in, you’ll be swearing NEVER to wear another shoe.

Uke–that’s what I’m told. I think much of my initial ecstasy comes from my previous habit of buying cheap shoes. (These were $60–far more than I’ve paid for a pair of shoes in recent memory.) Up until now, it really didn’t matter, since I spent most of my time on my ass in lectures. Now, between three hours of rounds and four hour surgeries, cheap shoes don’t do the job.

I’m afraid that I’ll like them too much, and then I’ll want a pair of their dress shoes, which approach the $200 mark.

Guin–I had just always heard of associations between lesbians and Birkenstocks. This only adds to my suspicion that I’m a lesbian–I’m also a big Indigo Girls fan. Not to mention that I enjoy having sex with women. (andygirl–didn’t mean to shut the door–feel free to make all the lesbian jokes you want. :slight_smile: )

Robinh–I don’t find the sandals particularly unattractive. (I have a very similar pair from L.L. Bean.) The clogs, however, can only be described as butt-ugly. I like that, though–it’s not like our green scrubs are attractive to begin with. Besides, when you’ve been on call for the last 24 hours, goofy shoes might be the thing that keeps you grounded.

Dr. J

In Germany several decades ago, Birkenstocks were considered the shoe of lesbians and radical intellectuals. If you were them, you were one, the other, or both.

There’s nothing like a well made pair of shoes especially when one’s job calls for you to be on yur feet all day. I have some HH Brown steel toed shoes that are in their fifth year and just purhased some Deer Stag hiking boots. They cost $85.00 and $120.00 respectively and are worth every penny.

If I wore Birkenstocks would I have to worry about people thinking I was a lesbian? I once made a joke about women in comfortable shoes in front of two really butch ladies that just happened to be lesbians. I found out later that I came very close to having my ass dragged out into the alley for a whupping by these two. No sense of ha ha with some people. The next time I saw them I looked at thier footwear, yup… Birks.

Lesbians have never been known for having any sort of style sense whatsoever - flannel shirts, hiking boots, mullets - and since the Birkenstock is the single most hideous shoe ever created, and completely devoid of style and taste, that they somehow became linked together, like two pigs wrestling under a blanket.

I’m sorry, and maybe it’s because I live in New York, but “They’re so comfortable!” is NOT a defense from “Those are so hideous!”. One does not excuse the other. I think sleeping in bed all day is far more comfortable than going to work, but that does not mean I actually get to stay home all day.

And please don’t tell me you’re wearing socks with these demon-shoe-spawn, are you? Because then you need to be shot.

Just wanted to point out that I live just a few hours away from a Birkenstock outlet. Last time I went, I paid just $70 for 3 pairs. :slight_smile: <---- Dang I wish we had a smug bastard smilie.

I love my Birks, especially now that I’ve developed a touch of arthritis in a toe I broke a few years back. I think I’m going to go down to the outlet before Christmas and buy everyone on my list a pair of the basic sandals for gifts this year and a pair of the dressy shoes for me & MisterTot.

And MisterTot will be so happy to hear that my choice of footwear makes me a lesbian! It’s been his dream for years!

Mass produced, inexpensive shoes use just basic materials and foot molds. Better shoes take more consideration into the sole design and fit.

One of the worst designs in the universe came from the design of cowboy boots - which were designed for horse stirrups and walking around piles of manure. The pointy toe. That design wrecked more peoples feet in the past 100 years than anything else.

I used to see a lot people born in the early 1900s walking around on beaches with hammer toes, huge bunions, massive, distorted big toe joints and toes all crunched together because of shoe design.

Hush Puppies started the move to more comfortable shoes with soft leather sides and composite soles. The move towards ‘sneakers’ saved millions of feet. I used to wear Dingo square toed boots when everyone else was wearing pointy toed ones, having noticed the deformities as a teen. Still, I used to get corns. I switched to sneakers and one day realized that I had not had corns in ages, all the ones I’d developed were gone along with those annoying heavy callous build ups people used to get on the pad under the big toe.

As time went on, and younger people showed up more inclined to wear better shoes and sneakers, I noticed a sharp decrease in the ‘nasty looking’ feet on the beaches. (No, I do not have a foot fetish. Just observant.)

I used to cringe when I’d spot these woman on TV wearing those hideously pointy toed leather shoes in fashion from Paris and in the Western States, the style is still the old cowboy boot.

Once, when buying Dingo Boots (square toed) years ago, I complained to the pretty little sales girl that they were too tight. She pertly informed me that boots were supposed to be tight, that her husband always walked around swearing and complaining as his new ones broke in. I told her I did not want mashed toes and bought a bigger size.

I never have figured that philosophy out, because not only did it mash your toes up, but eventually those good looking boots stretched out and got all crappy looking.

A girl friend of mine used to wear leather open toed clogs and loved them. There was/is a style of shoe out with wide, oblique square toes that young people wore in the 70s that looked funny at first and then cool.

Podiatrists are probably ticked off because now days, they have less corn, callous and twisted toe work to do.

Medical shoes are really great because of the sole, designed to distribute pressure and the ‘top,’ designed not to squeeze your foot. Custom fit shoes are even better, taken from a mold of your foot, but often ugly as heck. Still, people I know who wear them say they have never had anything better, even though the cost is quite high.

I had my ingrown toenail chopped off for the second time in 5 years a few months ago (no picnic, let me tell you!), and I decided it was time to ditch my preferred pointy-toe shoes in favor of some Birks. I’d bought some fake rubber Birks for walking the dog in the wet morning grass, and as my toe had gotten more painful, I found that they were the only ones I could wear, so I decided to shell out for the real thing.

Lordy, they are comfy, all right! I had despised the style for years – the dorky socks-with-clogs thing – but damn, it’s growing on me. (I just don’t wear the ragg socks – a little too traditional for me.) I got two pairs of clogs for about $225, and I think I’ll get a pair or two of the regular shoes for winter. No more cheap shoes for me!

As for the lesbian thing, I’ve been mistaken for one on more than one occasion. I don’t think the Birks will have a noticeable effect.

New York is a big town, pal. We’re not all Park Avenue Ladies Who Lunch.

The Birkenstock is considered the Official Footwear of Park Slope, Brooklyn, ancestral neighborhood of crunchy-granola lesbians and twee left-wing intellectuals. I think they’re pretty popular on the Upper West Side, too.

“They’re so comfortable!” is NOT a defense from “Those are so
hideous!” One does not excuse the other. I think sleeping in bed all day is far more comfortable than going to work, but that does not mean I actually get to stay home all day.

—I have found my soul mate!

I wear comfy, sensible walking shoes (NOT marshmallow-like sneakers) to walk to work. But once I get there, and for social occasions, give me a nice pair of 2" heels. Charles Jourdan . . . Jimmy Choo . . . Mmmm.

Just remember, like Mummy always told me: “Only YOU know how you feel. EVERYONE knows how you LOOK.”

Amen! Go, Dyke Slope!

I love my “Jesus Joggers.”

They’ve been recorked once and resoled thrice, and I had to put new liners in once.

I simply CANNOT bring myself to wear them with socks, though. Clogs and socks, okay. Sandles and socks? Sorry. That just ain’t right. Kind of a pitty, though, as I knit and have some very interesting socks that I don’t really get a chance to show off. I’ve been considering getting some clogs for colder weather, though.

As to why they’re so comfortable: as many have commented, it’s just hard for us broad-footed folk to find shoes that are wide enough without them being ridiculously too long, especially in America. Also, I think the cork soles are the perfect impact-absorbtion material for normal walking and standing. For running, you definitely need something with more “give” but if you’re not doing anything high-impact, cork gives you more support–cradles the foot more effectively.

I use to make fun of the hippies who wore the jesus like sandals.

Then…(desperate for comfortable footware while on vacation and tired of foot cramps.) I bought a pair whilst in Deutschland -Arbeit Mach Frei!) and all I have to say is that everything I have ever mocked, I have become.
Give me five minutes and I can sell anyone a pair of birks. I don’t give testamonials over something as argumentative as religious dogma, my religion, per se, is Birkenstock.

I wear nothing else ( unless the weather is supremely crapola, then it’s sorrells.) They are the most comfortable shoes I own. ( I do own Teva’s and Clarks and Naot’s too, but the birks are my workhorse of my footlife.) They are worth every penny.

Oh, and I wear the flannel shirts, the short hair style and birks. I am not, nor have I ever been without my knowledge, a lesbian.
To complete this rambling incoherent missive, the reason why birks are so damned comfy is because the cork supports your foot evenly all day long during standing and walking. Because, in reality, that is all we ever really do. Athletic Shoes ( an oxymoron If I ever heard on) are meant for faster paced things, like outrunning muggers. I haven’t worn athletic shoes in years and have just bought Teva’s for my rambles on the treadmill.