Bobby Jindal now says the UK is HIS country?
Did he roll well in RISK???
Second, even though the FOX news talking-head that made these claims has been publicly discredited and FOX has apologized for the misstatement on air, he’s gone back to backing this false claim? Wow!!!
Jindal Tales! Jindal Tales! Jindal Does UK!!!
Oh What Fun It is to Spout
Not Thinking what you say!
Hey!
Jindal Tales! Jindal Tales! Jindal Does UK!!!
Oh What Fun It is to Spout
Not Thinking what you say!
Faux-News is In-The-Know
(Cause Murdoch knows UK) :rolleyes:
Talk-points swirl & flow
(PM laughing all the way!) No-Go-Joe
Making Panic King
And The Public much-less bright
With glee, fear-mongers laugh and sing
(and try to pick new fights!)
Ohhhh…
Jindal Tales! Jindal Tales! Jindal Does UK!!!
Oh What Fun It is to Spout
Not Thinking what you say!!
Earlier Monday, in an address to the Henry Jackson Society in London, Jindal said that “in the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home,” according to prepared remarks.
“It is startling to think that any country would allow, even unofficially, for a so called ‘no-go zone.’ The idea that a free country would allow for specific areas of its country to operate in an autonomous way that is not free and is in direct opposition to its laws is hard to fathom,” he added.
Guess he didn’t learn anything from the Fox walk back that occurred recently. Two different CNN reporters/analysts/commentators (?) asked him for details and Jindal would provide none.
The parts of his speech you quote are masterful rhetoric, used to assholish ends.
“in the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home,” according to prepared remarks.
His comment has to be precisely correct since by definition that is what non-assimilationist Muslims would do. A careless listener is given the impression (probably intentionally) that he’s saying that all (or most or many) Muslims are non-assimilationist, but if he’s called on the accuracy of his comment, it is by definition accurate, even if the impression conveyed is not.
“It is startling to think that any country would allow, even unofficially, for a so called ‘no-go zone.’ The idea that a free country would allow for specific areas of its country to operate in an autonomous way that is not free and is in direct opposition to its laws is hard to fathom,” he added.
Note that he gives the impression that this is actually happening while never actually saying so. Again, a careless listener will hear this as testimony that countries are allowing ‘no-go zones’ etc but if he’s called on it, he’ll say he never actually said any country was doing so, only that it would be startling and hard to fathom.
How to stir up racial tension while never actually saying anything incorrect.
While there may not be any ‘no-go’ areas for non muslims in Birmingham, I should note that it has a far higher proportion of Villains than any other city in Europe.