The way I read your cite tells me that your thread title is wrong. The study didn’t say that blocked arteries resulting in chest pains don’t cause heart attacks. It does say that using angioplasty to correct the problem isn’t effective in the long term.
It also says that bypass surgery which jumps the blood supply around the blocked arteries is effective.
I know–I wasn’t questioning the primary thrust of the article at all. I’m only curious about that one quote from the cited doctor: that the blocked arteries that are the cause of most chest pain–the ones that doctors target with angioplasties/stents–are NOT a major cause of heart attacks; heart attacks are instead caused by other vessels … (so what are those vessels like, and why do they cause heart attacks?)
In the article there was this, which goes along with what I quoted below from your cite.
Possibly Dr. Naron was referring to the fact that, since arteriosclerosis affects all the arteries, the probablity is high that the blockage that cause a heart attack came from somewhere else and not from the small section of artery that causes chest pains.
http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0702/feature1/index.html
not my specialty, but I did read this article recently, pretty interesting, scroll down to paragragh 9-11. Basically acute MI is more likely to come from a rapid plaque rupture than a “stable” narrowing. The former being unpredictable, and thus unaffected by angioplasty.