Brazil84 doesn't get what's wrong with the claim that majorities of sub-saharan africans are retards

Right. I guess an average person from eastern Europe would be better than an avg person from anywhere else in the world when it comes to mathematics, algorithm and other logic based stuff. It would be due to the culture and also because of favorable conditions (favorable climate, less extreme poverty etc)

I think that people that constantly spew hate speech, and knowingly lie, over and over and over, to justify their hate speech are “being a jerk”. Do you think these people are not being a jerk?

Do you think that Der Trihs should totally be allowed to say whatever he wants in GD, or do you only complain when conservatives are insulted, and not minorities?

That’s what I thought.

You have the notion that conservatives shouldn’t be said bad things about, but it’s ok to say that non-whites are mentally retarded. I love it when conservatives douches like you reveal their true colors. Thanks for the laugh, and not letting me down.

Not so. Africans are renowned for their natural algorithm.

IQ of south Asian nations is around 80. So we are borderline retards as well(not that we need the IQ tests to confirm to us the same).

One of the fundamental principles of the board is that we do not moderate points of view. A bad idea is best countered by a good idea, not by being suppressed.

Plus, a lot of our posters seem to really enjoy arguing with bigots. Why should we deprive them of their fun?

So anyway, Brazzy, you made it very clear that you think that illiteracy is a sign of low intelligence.

Anyway, as I pointed out this is as moronic as claiming that monolingualism, which is true of most Americans, Australians, Irishman, Britons, and Anglophone Canadians, is a sign of low intelligence.

So, do you think that South African blacks, most of whom speak multiple languages are more intelligent that white Americans(most of whom only speak one)?

Similarly, how many languages do you speak?

If you disagree, then please explain your reasoning.

Also, please do show the courage to reply.

We all know that you’re a pathetic, lonely loser but it would be great if you could at least pretend otherwise.

Thanks in advance.

Edit: In case I’ve been Brazil banned, would someone who’s not mind doing their own version of this who’s not so he doesn’t have an excuse other than cowardice to justify avoiding the question.

I would, but I’m part of the growing “People Smarter Than That Stupid Racist Ratfucker” club.

Yes, I do. BUt the question is, how do you know they are lying? And “knowingly lie” is redundant. Lying is knowingly relating an untruth. If you don’t know/believe it to be untrue, it is not a lie, it is simply a wrong statement. So, do you have some new device to determine who on the internet is lying, i.e., knowingly relaying a falsehood?

Yes, I do think Der Trihs should be able to say whatever he likes, within the rules. I have zero problem with him starting a thread saying the most hateful things about Christians or the military or Republicans or whoever. The problem I have with that douche is that he injects his nonsense into all manner of GD threads as if his little stunted-growth asides are as well established as the laws of physics.

Evidently, you’re not too good at the whole thinking thing then, huh? :smiley:

Also, as you might have noticed, there are many posters, on both sides of the political spectrum who have a problem with Der Trihs, so you may want to find a a more sympathetic douche bag to defend.

I hope you’re able to realize how wrong you are now. If not, I won’t be surprised.

Brazil, my man Ibn isn’t sure if you saw this or not…

North Carolina’s illiteracy rate is approximately equal to or slightly less than the national average.

http://nces.ed.gov/naal/estimates/overview.aspx

If you go to State and County Literacy Estimates - State Estimates and select North Carolina, 2003 (sorry, can’t direct link), you’ll find that the indirect measure of the percentage of adults in NC lacking BPLS (basic prose literacy skills) is 14%, with a 95% confidence of it being between 11% and 16.5%.

http://nces.ed.gov/naal/estimates/StateEstimates.aspx

He’s on my shit list so I don’t engage with him. The answer is no, I did not see it before and I did not read it now.

Why? Or can’t you read???

Because brazil84 is more than willfully ignorant, he actively seeks to perpetuate his ignorance. For him, a day without a new fact ignored is a wasted day.

So, he’s informationally illiterate. Makes sense.

If every last person were mentally retarded, you might have a point. However, even in a country with an average IQ of 70, there will be a lot of people of high intelligence.

Perhaps more interestingly, out of curiosity, I did a Google search to find out who actually built the electrical grid in Botswanna and found this on the first page:

(my bolding)

I also found this on the first page:

(my bolding)

So I have a strong feeling that much of the shiny infrastructure you are crowing about is actually the doing of Western and/or East Asian contractors.

Perhaps the reason it’s absurdly obvious to you is that you are not thinking about it very carefully. For example, you don’t seem to have even considered the possibility that the shiny infrastructure in the capital city of one of the most advanced black African nations was built by foreigners.

It seems your guess is pretty much just wild speculation and self-serving at that.

But since you use the phrase “start to fall apart,” can I take it you agree that there is some average national IQ where one would expect things to be functional but functioning poorly?

Also, are you saying that the average national IQs in all countries are equal?

Well what exactly is it that I don’t understand?

I must have missed it – can you point to the post where you specifically stated that the United States in the 1930s was far from non-functional?

Also, can you please point to the post where you specifically stated that a particular cite indicated that the average IQ in the US in the 1930s was about 80?

TIA.

So you believe that improvements in nutrition and education (e.g. iodization of salt) played no role in any increase in IQs in the United States between the 1930s and the present?

I’m not sure you have that great a handle on statistics.

Yes, it is nearly equal.

For ex. If a million poor kids from south asia are taken and raised in any host country, you will find their average IQ when they grow up will resemble the average IQ of the host country. Intelligence depends on factors like culture, literacy, extreme poverty, nutrition, climate etc. Comparing IQs of different races in useless.

If you wanna do research on factors/genes related to high intelligence, then do a study on scientists, researchers, mathematicians, chess players etc versus the normal population.

Cognitive improvement, not native intelligence. If you’ve had a bad night’s sleep, has your actual IQ gone down? Or is that possible in your case?