"Breach"

Today, El Perro Fumando and I got out to see the movie, after failing to get tickets for a sold out matinee show yesterday (her rationale: old people like to see Sunday matinees and Breach was the best movie for a Sunday matinee this week).

All in all, I’d say we both enjoyed the movie. It certainly does not deserve the tag of “spy thriller” that the studio and critics are trying to attach to it. It’s more a character study of somebody who happens to be a spy. Very little thrill involved. Despite that, I never felt bored during the film, even during the inevitable (and usually interminable) middle-of-the-movie-a-character-questions-himself scenes.

Chris Cooper was, as usual, excellent in inhabiting a role. Laura Linney was more than capable, and most of the supporting cast was solid. Unfortunately, Ryan Phillippe just doesn’t have much depth; when a key characteristic of his portrayal has to be the ability to out-lie a man who has dealt in lies for a quarter century, you need an actor who won’t be so wooden in his delivery, so high school drama clubby in his “anger” scenes. Though, for the most part, Phillippe’s inability was understated enough to not be too much of a distraction.

Speaking as somebody who has occasional need to visit FBI Headquarters, I’ll say that, by and large, the film showed great care in presenting the building, the agency, really that entire area of DC, pretty accurately*. The corridors looked like the real Hoover Building corridors, down to the style of the room number signs. Characters get to the building from the Archives or Federal Triangle Metro stations, as any sane person would in real life (though Metro Center would also be acceptable). The film acknowledges DC traffic tendencies, for Og’s sake. This is completely unlike most other movies set in a city like DC, where there will be a meeting at National Archives on 7th and Penn, and moments later, a reflection scene at the Lincoln Memorial, a mile and a half away, or easily accessible street parking outside of downtown, pedestrian only metro stations (in both cases, I’m looking at you, National Treasure).

The story definitely has a significant amount of speculation attached to it, which is unsurprising since much of the information pertinent to Hanssen’s espionage is, by the movie’s own admission, still classified. Thankfully, the story that is presented is well researched, and an entirely believable version of Hanssen’s capture. Overall, a very solid movie worth a watch.

*Through the movie, we see characters at the Archives and Federal Triangle stations. But at one point, inexplicably, at the Federal Triangle station, with a mock-up Archives sign prominently shown at ground level. Totally threw me out of the movie for a minute.

There was a segment on NPR featuring the fellow on whom the movie is based. (Can’t remember his name for the life of me.)

It was really neat to hear all of the detail that the director and producers put into making this film. They brought the guy in quite a few times to approve props-- was this briefcase exactly like the one the agent had? The man said that the carefully studied his mannerisms and tried (second-hand, of course) to replicate those of the counterspy. He said was surprised to see how well the cast did in aping them.

It was especially cool hearing him recount

the story of how they retrieved the data from the counterspy’s PalmPilot. I found myself sitting on the edge of the seat in my car, anxious to find out if he was going to get it back into the briefcase before the counterspy returned from the shooting range.

Agreed. They did not, in my opinion, do a very good job at building tension.I know we were supposed to be so worried that they’d get back early, before the agents were done going through the car, but I just couldn’t care. So what if he found them in his car?I do know why “so what” but I still don’t think that they built the tension as well as they could have.

Also agreed.

Eric O’Neill. I heard part of that, too, and it made me want to see the movie. But Ryan Phillippe wasn’t all that great, and when it was over, when they announced that Eric O’Neill had left the FBI to become a lawyer, my friend said, "I hope he’s a better lawyer than he was an agent."I just never believed he could outsmart Hanssen.

My other gripe was minor: Hanssen appeared to approve of O’Neill because O’Neill was Jesuit educated. But Hanssen was Opus Dei, or just this side of Opus Dei (he followed the sect, and went to a tridentine mass instead of a modern mass). I can’t see him endorsing a liberal Jesuit education.

But it didn’t suck, and I agree that they made good use of the DC location.

Nobody else has seen the movie?

It appears, from this site, that the movie opened on just under 1500 screens, and did over $10mil for opening weekend. So somebody got out to see it. I’m waiting to discuss :smiley:

Saw it last night with a friend. We both liked it a lot. I agree that it wasn’t a spy thriller, as such, but more of a character study. Had some thrilling moments, though. I thought both Cooper and Philippe did a good job, and were nicely contrasted: old and young, world-weary and bright-eyed, closed and open personalities. Nice to see Laura Linney, Dennis Haysbert (President Palmer from 24) and Gary Cole (the kinda dumb Vice President from The West Wing) in their respective roles. Good use of D.C. locales, and an interesting exploration of patriotism, secrecy, honor, trust and duty.

Surprised they didn’t make more of Hanssen’s Opus Dei ties, other than a single throwaway line.

Some articles that may be of interest…

Differences between real life and the movie:

A Washington Post overview of the Hanssen case:

An interview with the former agent and the movie director:http://movies.about.com/od/breach/a/breach020207.htm

Chris Cooper was great as always, but yeah, it wasn’t the thriller I thought it would be. I was most distracted by the bump on Ryan Phillippe’s head, which I hadn’t noticed in other movies. I felt it did more acting than he did, as it changed shape and interrupted the furrow of his brow.*

I agree that he didn’t seem smart enough to bring Hansen down.

I also was extra-thankful that I don’t work in an office with the door closed and no openings. I would collapse from claustraphobia in an office like that; I was uncomfortable just watching it on screen.
*I was telling my mom about this and she said “you can identify with that” since I have a bump on my forehead from falling on my face a lot as a kiddie. But his was much more pronounced than mine!

I saw this a couple of weeks ago. I thought Cooper was incredible, and I loved the fact that it didn’t give everything a neat answer at the end but didn’t leave Hanssen as just a monster or a cypher either. It was a great character study.

I remember seeing that scene and not being sure what was wrong about it. I lived in DC two years ago, but I only used those stops occasionally. Thanks for clearing it up!

That was weird. And I only noticed it near the beginning. Did it go away or did I get used to it?

In fairness, I’ve since used that stop a few times, and noticed that there is a Federal Triangle marker there, whereas I thought before that there was none. But the movie DEFINITELY said “Archives” for that one. Discussing with my wife, she thought it went a step further in not being authentic, by only reading “Archives” instead of “Archives / Navy Memorial.” But I just don’t remember that vividly.

Also, having been to FBI HQ on work a few times since the movie’s come out, I further appreciated the authenticity they showed with their “inside the building” setpieces.

Oh no, it stayed. At one point it looked a little deflated, and then it was full again in the next scene. Of course its obviousness depended on the lighting.

It looks like the bump was around even during the Cruel Intentions days; I don’t remember noticing it then.

I saw Breach a few weeks ago and really liked it. I’ve heard bits of the Hanssen story in various briefings over the years, so I wondered how well the movie would hold my attention, but I didn’t look at my watch once during the film. I agree that it’s definitely not a thriller, but I found it to be pretty compelling. I also agree that they did a good job with the DC location.