My girlfriend and I were out the other night with a friend who flies into town occasionally on business. We were discussing this and that he happened to mention that after a discussion he had on the plane that afternoon with a doctor/researcher he would never, ever eat at Hooters again even on a bet. This doctor was apparently involved (at some point) in research related to the series of lawsuits brought against implant manufacturers and had investigated the link between implants and disease. According to our friend what the doctor discovered was surprising.
While they failed to make a direct causal connection between most of the disease complaints and the implants they did discover that women with breast implants had, on average, much, much higher incidences of several particularly nasty, sexually transmitted viral and bacterial diseases and many did in fact have deficient immune systems relative to the non-implant female population. They looked for a connection but all they find were, according the doctor, “bad lifestyle choices” to explain these problems (higher levels of non-safe sex promiscuity, smoking, drinking, drug use etc). Apparently this was politically unpalatable to present as an explanation and the research was shelved.
Was this “researcher” feeding him a line or is this really a feasible explanation for the implant = sickness argument that the lawsuits were fighting over?