Bricker is a Pile of Shit Sculpted into Human Shape

You don’t have an ex you love like crazy but wish you never met? That happens?

Sure, but my point is not “Bricker likes to argue about legality… others like to argue about ethics”. It’s “Bricker likes to argue about legality with people who think they are arguing about ethics”. Both are reasonable debates to have, but it behooves us all to be clear about which debate we’re engaging in.

Ha! Ask me how Dora the Explorer stops Swiper the fox from stealing stuff! (I have a fifteen year old son: ten years ago he was five and Thomas ruled the household).

Swiper no swiping!

Tell me all you know about Sofia the First, and a crowd favorite in my household, Avatar the Last Airbender.

Your really should try sigging with “bless your heart” :smiley:

Sofia the First - newly minted princess after her commoner mom marries the King of Enchantia. Has an amulet that summons animals and lets her talk to them. Sounds remarkably like Alex Dunphy when she talks. Friends include Ruby and Jade. Enemies include Miss Nettle.

(I have an honorary niece, third grade). :slight_smile:

Got nothing on the Last Airbender, though.

Don’t be fooled by his folksy demeanor. He is nothing but Hatt’s mouthpiece.

As one of my favorite animated shows, I must recommend you correct this grievous error in judgment and watch this show immediately. It is streaming on Amazon Prime and it is great for adults and children. I describe it as a complex show disguised as a children’s program. If you fail to watch this show, I’ll have to question your judgment in all things.

It seems like highlighting liberal hypocrisy, seems redundant, gets your goat.

You are as much of a dumbshit as ever. Sadly, I can’t offer you remedial reading classes, but check with your local literacy council.

Edit: just saw this post. Nice thing is, my response to Shodan gets to be a twofer.

I know the Dora one! I have a 14 year old son and 13 year old daughter. They were never into Thomas & Friends I guess. I consider myself lucky :slight_smile:

C’mon. Your whining about Bricker’s accurate depiction of liberal hypocrisy is a round about ad hominem fallacy. That’s shameful. Rebut the claim don’t attack the source.

Madness. Hatt is a boss but not a Boss, if you take my meaning, and the trains don’t work for him out of fear or obligation, but out of joy for the work.

Cut Princess a break. LHOD went from being a liberal weenie who cried hirself to sleep when Dopers talked mean to hir to the assertive Big T MK.II who scolds like a motherfucker. That’s progress, after a fashion.

Might be the stroke talking, but I vaguely remember hir being coddled as “Daniel Tiger” or some such shit.

Even if it were accurate–and it’s not–it would be a bullshit thing to bring into the multiple threads he brought it into.

Scumpup, I’ll give you this, you try.

Here we go.

You were all snotty and tearstained and wanted a thread to garner support. Not my most shining moment, by a long shot, but at least I wasn’t pity farming.

Eleven years ago. I figure the Statue of Lamentations has run out.

Added to that, his username references Ursula K. LeGuinn, whereas yours…

Fuck off, you ersatz Woodie Guthrie neverwas.

In addition to being bloodthirsty, right-wingers are also dumb and incompetent most of the time, hence they fail to follow through.