No, she - and you - are utterly wrong. Don’t forget, there are other people who’ve read and participated in that thread. That you don’t understand how the legal system works, or even what laws are, doesn’t mean other people don’t.
you with the face has repeatedly changed her assertions every time they’ve been proved false, coming up with ever more ridiculous hypotheticals, not supported by facts, to justify her quest to show Zimmerman is guilty of something - anything - regardless of Florida law, and the facts of the case.
I will agree with her that, had he taken significantly different actions, in California, he might well be guilty of murder. I’m still failing to grasp the relevance of that, though.
I’ll say again something I said very early on in these discussions. If you believe that Zimmerman’s actions were morally wrong, and ought to be illegal - that is, if you believe that it’s wrong for him to follow and question someone acting suspiciously in a private place, or to use lethal force to defend himself against a sustained attack, then you need to focus on getting the laws that allow him to do these things changed, not on punishing him for actions that were legal.
If you believe that I’ve incorrectly summarised his actions, you need to show me wrong with actual evidence, not constant supposition.
If you simply want him punished because he killed a black kid, regardless of whether he was legally or morally entitled to, which is certainly what ywtf thinks, you need get your racist selves a clue.