I’ve taken pause to let my mind consider precisely
where it’s coming from. How I can summarize what it is that
I am communicating, without creating confusion above and
beyond curiosities for clarification that would engage this
conversation. Here is that attempt.
Counter-intelligence is observed rationally as a
mechanism which ‘seeks’ to maintain cohesiveness through
mis-direction, falsehood, contradiction and omission.
Counter-intelligence is distinguished from intelligence as
being an expression which contradicts its own purpose for
being expressed; thus negating the entire existential
purpose and validity of the user.
Counter-intelligence is a state of delusion which
maintains cohesiveness of existential value.
Much like the "Messiah Complex" noted earlier; a
proper definition of intelligence starves these systems of
delusion from an existentially positive reality; by allowing a
readily accessible and assessable means of use and
comprehension through the transparency which rationality
embodies.
In the instance of the "Messiah Complex"; the
system is defeated by applying existentially positive burden
to the definition process, and ultimately, the properties
associated with the term. This allows one the ability to
discern a given term meaningfully in the sense that the
burden requires the term to have a valid/rational reason for
being distinguished as:
Not another synonym of everything and/or anything
For this specific example in regards to Messiah, it
may help to see the process applied to something else,
before it is applied to intelligence.
Property of Messiah in order to have an existentially valid
reason to be conceptually discerned from anything else:
(Basically, a revised definition of Messiah that decrypts all
of the counter-intelligence routines that foster systems of
non-transparency used to execute abuse unaccountably.)
Messiah: Property of existence which perfectly copies and
transfers all of its abilities and conceptual framework to
operate and exercise those abilities, instantly, to any and/or
all who ask, regardless of their conceptual framework,
appearance or motive. Giving all ability to perform and
conceive, instantaneously; upon request; no questions asked.
What this definition of Messiah accomplishes is a rationalization
of what is worthy of recognition in terms of absolute truth and
potence. For a body to be imbued with the absolute and refuse
to instantly (is also all-powerful; follows from all-truthful) grant
a request for understanding, shows that this object of being is
lying or insanely absurd.
Either it cannot communicate to you instantaneously, which
renders it as impotent; thus ignorant, or it doesn’t care about
your request, in which case that truth itself is impotent: unless!
that truth is not communicated, which negates the absolute
value of existential purpose for even surviving, both of yourself
and the being in question; making the being insanely absurd
(if it’s not lying).
A strong definition illuminates instantly, whether an absolute state
or archetype is being rationally, existentially; positively observed.
If it is being observed, then the definition renders its power as
actually being redemptive of existence itself, by not excluding an
aspect of existence’s desire to know that truth itself; no
matter how much ignorance it may possess in relation to that truth.
Ignorance and absolute truth cannot occupy the same space.
To withhold absolute truth is to prove ignorance has existential value,
which renders the truth as negating the purpose of anything even
existing at all: A Messiah is charged with providing, through truth
and action, the inarguable understanding of existence rather than
non-existence. A false messiah will avoid being observed or
questioned in relation to themselves and the concept of
non-existence. They will heal, but not grant the ability to heal.
They will know, but speak in riddles and not grant the clear ability
to know. This behavior is inexcusable when the claim of
absolute value is brought up.
Messiah is called “Hero” in the extreme secular sense. Even in this
environment, the term ‘hero’ assumes a messianic inclination, so as
to use the same system without the absurdity of using the term
Messiah in a secular environment. Heroes are not conveyed as
having absolute power, yet their actions are implied as being
absolutely correct. It seeks to blur the line that is drawn to decrypt
these types of self-negating routines, by attempting to stack an
additional form of encryption; which allows us to believe in
absolutes without the strong evidence required. (i.e. “People who
don’t know everything are observed by everyone as doing all the
right things.”) It appeals to the sense of ego by both the
perpetrators and the subverted.
Another counter-intelligence routine that we see in modern
society dressed in different clothes from before
(like Hero and Messiah) is the idea of relativity; to confuse one about
the existence of rationality. To assert that rationality is characterized
by accepting that there is no such thing. With relativity we have this
idea of a messiah in Einstein; this omni-scient being of sorts, who
contributed the conceptual framework to actually create a tool of
potency.
It is suggested, that in order to understand this brilliant savior, exhibiting
phenomenal proof of his fitness to speak for truth, that one must realize:
“Everything is relative”; much like Plato and the Oracle of Delphi motif.
To not believe or understand this, is to absurdly deny that truth which
allowed the discovery to create and reproduce the ability to split the atom
and calculate the planetary orbits accurately enough to rendezvous with a
human created satellite traveling millions of miles in decades of time.
It is appeal to authority; through the confusion of ‘relativism’.
The only thing ‘relativism’ actually asserted is a truth which renders all of the
points of perspective within its purview as being ignorantly held in light of a
truth which settled opinion of the matter once and for all. ‘Relativity’, as
equated with nuclear physics these days, is simply another case in history
where vast commodities of opinion (and commodities whose foundations rest
on these opinions) have been collapsed. It’s to say: "You can hold this
opinion; however, it is now ignorant unless it is viewed through the
mechanism which collapsed all of the individual debates that gave this opinion
a commodity in the past.
What’s ironic, is that the theory Einstein submitted
(solved by someone else), doesn’t collapse many debates at all; just a few
scientific ones, many of which didn’t even last long enough to build a viably
entrenched commodity. Yet, society is led to believe that
“Everything is relative.”. If the ‘theory of relativity’ asserted anything, it
asserted once again that there is truth, and revealed once again that truth
collapses opinion. It continuously hints at, without stating: “Those who have
been surviving and thriving disingenuously off of
those opinions, can be detected with an efficient calculator programmed with
provable means.” It keeps hinting at a moral law which collapses the debates
of righteous opinion. Lot’s of people are subsisting solely on this resource, in
every class of society. The disenfranchised will naturally be more receptive
though.
Historically, the idea that there is a system which collapses
the opinions of morality, has received severe counter-intelligent resistance.
Many people are making a lot of money by cannibalizing their own existential
value, and not dying. It is not a miracle that they don’t die; they are simply
insanely absurd beings who are lying.
Back To The Topic Of Definitions
To illuminate this complexity before returning to intelligence, I want to return
to the discussion of defining in regards to ‘Messiah’.
Any discernible object which does not comply instantaneous transfer upon
request, is deemed as a perpetrator of fraud. The conclusion renders:
“Observation of this object is an absurd association with the commodity of
truth used to represent that term.”
It is to say that observation and truth are not associative in terms of the
properties used to discern the object and term from ‘anything at all’; as
opposed to simply defining it as: “Just another synonym for anything
and/or everything.”. Counter-intelligence encrypts terms that are
synonyms with “Everything and/or anything at all”, while defining it with
properties of distinction.
Counter-intelligent people don’t typically sit at a table with you, while you’re
both eating a cheese sandwich and say; “Don’t eat a cheese sandwich, or
you are not as good as me.”, as they take a bite from it themselves.
Some of these encryptions are literally this pathetic in terms of the obvious
contradiction conveyed. In the Messiah example, this encryption is slightly
more complex; yet transfers the same existential negation as the more
transparent cheese sandwich scenario.
It’s like telling someone you’re
going to kill them, and then letting them have a last word to convince you.
They do convince you, and you let them go. The very nature of the threat
however, revokes that persons right to trust who first made the threat.
The mere insanity of threatening to kill someone and the additional
insanity of contradicting ones own reason for a course of action, leaves
the person walking away, not knowing whether they’ll be killed by that
person or their orders, walking towards the door out or not, or even
assassinated at some future point by this individuals expressed will.
This persons word means nothing at all any more; really forever in that
sense. It is a compound contradiction representative of irrational beings.
It also is used to abuse others as a form of terrorism; and allows for the
centration of resource and capital.
To the degree that an individual or collective operates existentially, for a
reason that they deem absurd to relate upon request, negates their
existential rationality and proves suicide as the most rational expression
of their own belief of truth. This suicide must either be of the belief held
or the body which acts in accordance with the belief.
The attacks which ‘terrorize’ Western culture are the physical reflective
inverse of the psychological system that uses contradiction to cannibalize
ones existential value to receive resource. It is the same exact system
being used in this society to effect potence. ‘We’ are cannibalizing our
own existential validation (committing suicide) in order to maintain and
generate commodity be indenturing people to a metabolic resource.
Western society is terrorizing the indentured systems of others by
committing suicide for a reason other than being consistent with:
“I don’t believe in anything at all”. It is a counter-intelligent application
of rationality, and resultantly causes ignorant polarity; which has long
been collapsed by observation which has consolidated opinion on the
matter. This pressure against counter-intelligence is causing
counter-intelligent mechanisms to act more absurd and desperate.
The frequency of contradictions extracted from the primary contradiction
in media has increased substantially, to the point where media is not
embarrassed to talk precisely like a schizophrenic. Our own president
and staff talk like a schizophrenics, without the slightest bit of
acknowledgment or ‘shame’. It reveals panic IMO.
Using these types of systems (counter-intelligent) is the equivalent of
gaining attention and validating yourself by turning up your radio and
our music up to such an extreme volume that it resonates the entire
sensory framework of others in such a way as to disable their wills
until they give you the commodity of their presence and their immediate
focus. The resultant acts can always be validated, but ignoring it
causes the symbiot to starve to death; a withdrawal symptom of its
delusionary life-force eclipsed by rationality.
In terms of this ‘terrorism’ phenomenon, we are quite literally
screaming at our own reflection in a mirror; turned around.
We are too absurd to recognize that it is in fact ourselves we
are criticizing in an ignorant system of counter-intelligence that
has been identified and collapsed by rationality.
Our continued counter-intelligent stance in relation to ourselves
and the system reflecting it will only create more of the same.
Destroying a mirror does not destroy mirrors - reflection being
a property of nature; an embedded conceptual archetype required
for our existence and abstraction. In a system of simple reflection
and projection; there is no such thing as a victor, there is only the
idea which collapses the resource altogether, that has
existential validity.
I’m attempting to convey the necessary lines that need to be drawn
on the concept of reason itself, in order for this and all inverse
reflections to be recognized by us. I’m trying to articulate how to
behave intelligently and how to observe intelligent behavior.
I’m attempting to bring these tools, so that people are not
committing existential suicide to thrive phenomenally (it is irrational).
I am cataloging all of the minutiae of axioms of rationality, and bringing
to observation these axioms; showing eventually the isolation of an
algorithmic process which outputs only rationality, with an
instantaneous decryption process. This is what I understand myself
to be observing currently, and concur that I may myself be wholly or
partially delusional. In fact, not having wholly solved the formulation
which collapses delusion, one can suggest from this alone that I must
be delusional to some degree, if not wholly. In fact, the evidence
seems obvious for this, even if I’m correct:
I’m taking a long time to convey this conceptual framework for peer
review (peer = other human beings). It is big, cumbersome, somewhat
unexciting and not particularly efficient time wise or processing wise;
much like I imagine the first supercomputer was. Rather than being a
computer itself; this is a computational framework being assembled to
collapse the time wasted by squabbling opinions about morality; and
ultimately opinion itself. Applying it to computer language and
processing is a step in efficiency; rather than a step of validity for
these ideas.
Much of the suicide language in this thread is a result of how I have
come to observe a relevant mechanism embedded in the property of
intelligence, for it to have any meaning what-so-ever.
In the instance of the Messiah decryption routine, I used a mechanism
of potency to disable the counter-intelligent mechanism which can
emerge of it inherently by counter-intelligence siphoning the term
for resource.
To disable the ‘Messiah-like’ complex embedded in counter-intelligence
itself; the observation of suicide must be integrated to decrypt
mechanisms which negate existential value itself; at the source.
This is the strongest form of encryption; as it accesses the indentured
system at the primary level - by attacking rationality itself. Suicide,
conceptually, is the strongest existential decryption device known to
beings that abstract intelligence in the means that it’s commonly
defined and conceptualized in our culture. I imagine that the dictionary
will render an absurd (counter-intelligent) circularity as you start to chase
down “reason” from “intelligence” etc… (Eluding to the post that said
the dictionary defined Intelligent as “That which reasons” (or something
like that)). The concept and abstraction of suicide allowed this recursion
to occur in the first place; as a point of reference with which to observe
and abstract: ‘self moving with self purpose’.
In regards to defining custard as a property of intelligence,
(i.e. reason, ability to be rationalized by
being congealed consistently to existence),
I’m pointing out a reality that emerges of necessity in order for intelligence
to be discernible and meaningful as a word worth separating from
‘anything at all’ conceptually. The basis of this will be explaining why we
are required (in rationality) to anthropromorphize in order to abstract.
In light of this, I bring up an inherent vulnerability of this process; moving to explain how rationality ‘itself’ handles this in nature.
I plan to re-articulate this observation again; with the clarity I hope this post coherently applied as a summary of the intents and cohesiveness attempting to be conveyed by myself, towards you.
-Justhink