Moonshine,
Tsk tsk yourself.
You posted ‘I certainly don’t think they (receiving stolen goods / burglary) are comparable on any scale of “wrongness”.’
I think most burglary (TV, video, computers, jewellery, guns, cars) is done in the expectation of fencing the goods. It’s practically a conspiracy!
You didn’t comment on my tougher comparison ‘Which would you rather happen: your home gets robbed or your bank gets robbed?’. (My point is that crime affects people more if it’s personal, not just because more money is taken).
You posted ‘Skummet didn’t ask to be kicked around the Board and called childish names by people who have been here long enough to know better.’
I agree, but surely it was Sailor (who understandably has strong feelings because he’s been burgled) who called Skummet names? You imply I was calling him a psychopath. Certainly not. Read the context of my post:
‘And saying someone can do something that wasn’t so wrong TO THEM is a dangerous slope. By all means protest democratically against laws you think are unjust. But remember that one definition of psychopath is ‘chronic mental disorder, especially with abnormal or violent social behaviour’…’
I accept I could have spelt it out better, but my point was the following sequence:
- it’s unlawful - but it doesn’t seem wrong to me
- I won’t protest against it - I’ll just break the law
- I’ll break any law I want…
is something best avoided.
I draw your attention to some of my postings to Skummet:
‘I feel there’s a moral person inside you’
‘Some people would say you’re at heart a decent chap, who knows he did a bad thing, and is desperately seeking reassurance’
‘Yes, and now your conscience and basic decency has come thru’
‘I don’t know if you have a family, or intend to, but think about being able to tell your kids the true stories of how honest you were. They’ll look up to you, and you’ll feel good for the rest of your life’.
Take that, Skummet!
JimmyNipples,
I posted 'Let’s try your defence in court: ‘I bought this stuff at an incredibly cheap price. I got no receipt, no manual, no warranty. The guy who sold it didn’t offer any refunds (actually he didn’t give me his name) and insisted I paid cash. Of course I had NO IDEA it was stolen.’
You replied ‘How about this defence…This guy sold me a DVD player for 75 bux. He said he was going thru a messy divorce and needed cash.
Or…a friend of mine just got married. He got 3 microwaves!!! He just GAVE one to me…I need some cash more than I need a microwave…I’ll sell it to ya for 50 bux.’
Ingenious stuff. But don’t you have your suspicions? After all, burglars use these stories routinely or, depressingly, they just offer it cheap. In England, to say ‘it fell off the back of a lorry’ means ‘it’s stolen.’
You posted ‘I haven’t purchased any stolen items…to my knowledge…but buying things without receipts or a warranty happens daily. Garage sales, from classified ads and so on.’
Agreed, but there’s usually a difference between a reputable secondhand price (accompanied by some documentation), and a ‘stolen’ price.
You posted ‘Skummet…you are breaking the law and taking risk doing it…but not much of a risk…and it isn’t much of a law.’
I think it is an useful law. Are you saying we should abolish it? (Officer, that man’s driving my stolen car! Sorry, Sir, he paid the thief $1 for it, so that makes it his…)