I’m relatively slow with fashion, but I have noticed that it’s become fashionable for men to wear somewhat short trousers (or turn them up), with either ankle socks or no socks at all.
I have started trying this look, and it is pretty comfortable, but I am not sure if I may be committing (yet another) faux pas: I’m almost 40, and my ankles already have some wrinkles and noticeable veins. Is it time for me to give up on fashion?
(and yeah I do wear shorts sometimes too…I dunno, that feels different. Just showing the ankle seems like you’re drawing attention to it)
I find as I get older, I care less about what it looks like, and more about how comfortable I am. Outside of work, I wear shorts for half the year, as an alternative to feeling uncomfortably hot, but I am someone who always feels too hot. It’s mid-October and I am only now just considering the switch back to jeans or long trousers.
This is usually the monsoon season here in Oregon, but we’re having a long warm dry stretch with no clouds. Warm enough to wear shorts. So there’s some good from Global Warming.
I bicycle a lot so my legs are in good shape. Even though I’m over 60, I have no embarassment from wearing shorts of any length. I just wish that real shorts, not these knee length pants, would come back into style.
Short trousers? Those are capri pants, and this older dude isn’t rocking that style. I wear shorts whenever I want, though, if you don’t like my legs or my ankles, that’s on you.
Near as I can tell, the primary requisite for “rocking a style” is that you’re wearing it because it suits you, and you don’t care what other people think of it. This applies at any age.
As some men age, they lose height. I know my father is a couple of inches shorter than he was earlier and he’s in his eighties. And old guys are cheapskates, so they’re not going to buy new pants when they have perfectly good ones in the closet. So they continue to wear pants that are too long for them, either hiking them up so they seem to be wearing their pants too high or they have to roll up the cuffs at the bottom.
No, it’s not. He’s talking about how high the hem is. Younger people are currently wearing their pants either rolled up, or hemmed, high enough to reveal the ankle. Almost fifties jeans style. And the young and slim are making it look attractive too. Though I confess to being confused by the same look without socks, in the winter, but I digress.
It’s fashion, go along if you like it, or don’t if you don’t! This has always been the rule of fashion, but some are just WAY more about the latest thing and can get pretty rigid, as a result.
My hubby is over seventy, and I just took him to a wedding where he wore narrow leg black pants, hemmed shorter than he’s used to, but not quite ankle revealing, and a crisp white, Mandarin collar shirt, no tie. And he looked GOOD! And received many compliments.
Where what you want. At any age. If you’re not sure, try it and see! Fashion should be fun!
Can’t think of a single reason why I should care what anybody else thinks of them. I initially got them for hiking and cycling but quickly started wearing them all the time.
I never cared about what I looked like, or what was fashionable. I went with what was comfortable and what I liked. As I get older, I see no reason to change my standards.
I followed social and fashion rules as best I could for close to 40 years. It didn’t really suit me, and at 40 I realized following “just because” rules didn’t serve me either. I know how to dress and how to behave when it matters, but the other 99% of the time I suit myself and practically dare anyone to snark in my general direction. I’m going to be comfortable, and that means letting my legs go free, and ankle socks just because naked feet ruin shoes in short order (a fact I really wish my cowboy boot-wearing boy would accept), and long socks with shorts sort of defeats the purpose of wearing shorts. Highwater pants and rollups don’t suit me, though. Shorts or properly hemmed trou for this aging dude.
As far as being fashionable goes, if someone has a problem with how I dress it’s because they’re behind my cutting edge sensibilities.
My father, now 92, has always been a high water pants guy, and I’ve always been embarrassed to be seen with him. He was a college professor but looked retarded due to the short pants.
Michael Jackson could pull it off, but otherwise the quickest way to make a guy look like a dork is to put him in too-short pants. Pee Wee Herman Cosmo Kramer
If anyone can show me a picture of an older guy who doesn’t look like a dork in short pants, I will gladly admit I’m wrong and apologize.
And can anyone explain why a guy would choose this look?
I asked my personal consultant for fashion,(the lil’wrekker) and she said sure wear it, if you like it. I didnt know what you were describing until she explained it. These are regular trousers that are shorter than usual or rolled up to a shorter length. Not shorts or knee pants. The no-sock look is in like flynn. All the best dressed men are doing it. I was at a wedding this summer and all the groomsman and ushers were sockless with brown dress shoes. I found the brown shoes concerning with a black tux. Go figure?