Can somone please back-up or debunk this "fact" about plastic and Microwaves?

I received this in my email today as part of a mass-mailing (God I hate those!!)

Does anyone know if there is any truth to this?

Snopes says there’s some truth to this, but they aren’t too worried. It’s only some brands of plastic wrap that does this, and the ones labelled “microwave safe” are.

Apparently, both of these people did what it says they did, but neither is particularly reliable research. Plastic films labeled “microwave-safe” have probably been tested and found safe; the substances named have never actually been shown to cause any harm to humans; the actual use of these materials doesn’t necessarily correspond to the protocol used in the experiments.

Thanks!

Snopes is my friend. I should have checked there first.

I thought they moved from foam to paper because of “environmental concerns” - people perceive paper as recyclable (which it is, even though most of it isn’t recycled). In fact, dixons are formed during modern paper and paper pulp manufacture.

When you buy a dish to heat things in the microwave look on the box. You want to see “microwave safe” on it. That means the plastic, if it is plastic, is OK for the nuke oven. If it doesn’t say that, assume it’s not a good idea. This will probably solve 99.99% of the problem.

Consumer Reports did a study on this and also found using plastic wrap was safe.

Did they do long term toxicity studies ? What other things did they not check for ? Did they actually stew the plastic wrap in superheated oil, and then check the smoking residue for bad stuff, or did they assume that everyone tosses their cooking mistakes ?

Actually, a local television news recently showed a debunking of this. I attend UC Davis so I paid a bit of attention to the news segment in question.

First: The university asserted it has not conducted such research.
Second: The “researcher” named in the orginal hoax, according to the University rep in the news segment, is not employed nor a student at UC Davis.
Third: The segment closed with one of the people who actually is a researcher at the University “nuking” his plastic wrapped meal and consuming it on camera.

In short, it’s BS, judging by the madeup “researcher” at our local university inserted into the story to give it credence. You’d think that the hoaxter (hoaxster?) would’ve used the school’s website (http://www.ucdavis.edu) to check the directory and copy a real name!

Ah, but a real person could be contacted, allowing even easier debunking.

OK, so I’ve gone and necroed a decade and a half old thread, and even changed the title in my bump. But I want to know … how does her story end?

OK, back in 2000, this story was burning up the newsfeeds, and Snopes and The Straight Dope were all we had to debunk it with. Tiny little peeps of reason in the wild. Now this story is immortal – you never ever microwave anything in plastic or you’ll die from horrible belly explosion, researchers say, is what I always hear. I always shoot back, look it up, you’re quoting a 7th graders project, not a research project. The FDA long ago decided what to approve as a food safe container.

Pfft. As if. Of course the male-dominated, government sanctioned, fat cats just want to preserve the status quo. Even a 7th grader knows you think as much with your heart as with your brain when conducting science. Well, that’s the response I tend to get.

This is pretty much the story of the Mpemba effect – how warmer liquids freeze first. People still study it, and people still argue about it. But Mpemba himself isn’t now a theoretical physicist, he’s a game warden. His initial observations are no less valid, but that doesn’t make the science any better either.

So, Claire Nelson: tenured university theoretical chemist? analytical chemist for a major company? Eco-blogger? Paralegal in a consumer advocate legal firm? Account executive in a hometown insurance company? What?