I have asked dozens of women; the answer is no.
In all seriousness. it seems that most women do not care for anal sex, but many women do, and it seems those that do absolutely fucking love it.
From what I can tell, she – a major influence on modern feminism – was nowhere near the sex-is-rape camp. My mother has been a quintessential feminist, so I got a lot of exposure to the ideology. There may have been a small number of feminists who made sex-is-rape type assertions, but the majority of feminists (of that era) were women who felt crapped-upon by men and wanted to stand up against that (my mother being one of those). You get one or two adamant feminists saying that sex is rape into a mic and before you blink, the patriarchal establishment has slapped that sticker all the hell over feminism.
They can, but only on the man’s birthday.
Well, not much changed in that regard, I’m afraid.
Sex is still big, it’s the jeeps that got small.
I’m sure that if you keep asking then one will say yes. 
Psychological projection, or "Freudian projection: a defense mechanism in which one attributes to others one’s own unacceptable or unwanted attributes, thoughts, or emotions
So, that’s where Swee’ Pea came from!
You can ask a mod to fix the title. Just self-report your OP. Click the little triangle icon in the top right.
That was Kingsman: The Secret Service, and I’ll cop to not really “getting” the movie. Clearly it was an amped-up, over-the-top 007 homage, but it seemed aimed at some juvenile view of Bond that just didn’t click with me.
The scene(s) in question involved a kidnapped princess, literally locked in a cell, offering up her asshole if the hero “saves the world.” At the end of the movie, we see her roll over and present the hero his prize.
In a movie chock full of gratuitous violence and over-the-top dialog, this didn’t rate much more than a groan from me. It ended a movie I already wasn’t enjoying on an especially dumb note, but whatever, not my cup of tea. I think a lot of the ire at this scene involves stripping it of its context, so I don’t necessarily agree with the analysis, but it makes some sense – she’s not “asking” for anal sex because she likes it, she’s offering it up for his benefit; she’s in the middle of a traumatic experience and is under immediate duress due to being imprisoned, which may affect her ability to give rational consent; the “hero” doesn’t turn down his reward like we’d expect a gentlemen to do (tips fedora). Long story short, the scene has problems that probably don’t have anything to do with whether or not women can consent to anal sex.
Yes.
Cite: I am not a virgin.
Andrea Dworkin.
Friedman wasn’t a radical feminist, not that all radical feminist think intercourse is rape.
A woman once requested anal sex from me, and I politely refused. I still can’t tell whether that’s a story about me being a jerk, or me being awesome, or me being clueless; or, possibly, all three; or something else entirely.
(I wonder what a radfem type would say I should’ve done?)
Depends, how big was the strap-on?
Huh. Well, now I’m twice as glad that I refused.
And it finally explains the term “all terrain vehicle”.
I appreciate those of you who have attempted to provide serious answers and reasoned discussion. However, I’m having a hard time believing the premise of the thread— particularly given the claimed source of the OP’s information—is genuine. As such, I’m shutting this one down.
dude robert, this thread and some of your other topics (and your limited participation in them once you’ve started them) look a lot like trolling behavior. Curiosity is fine, but posting a random question with a nonsensical explanation and then walking away from it isn’t.