OP here. Interesting stuff in this thread, thanks to everyone who responded. Here’s a question in a similar vein.
How true is that old advice about “diarrhea, or even the mention of it, or other uncomfortable bodily functions” will get you out of a ticket? I mean, realistically, if you were seriously about to shit all over your car, would a cop just let you shit in your car and give you a ticket and leave you in a shit-smeared vehicle? I mean, I assume that no cop wants the negative PR associated with ticketing a person who really just needed to use the bathroom. No cop wants to be the douchebag who, because of their lack of compassion, caused the person to mess up their car. You cannot ask to prove a person is suffering from intestinal distress, correct? Even if the driver is trying to get out of a ticket, how can the cop be sure? He or she doesn’t know the driver’s health. It seems pretty foolproof to me, as NOBODY wants to get involved in another person’s private bodily functions. Would a cop follow you to a bathroom and wait for you to come out at which point you’d be ticketed?
I’m not obsessed with bowel movements, but I do know that it’s an easy way to get out of stuff. When I was in 6th grade, I didn’t do a presentation, and when it was my day to get called up, I asked at the beginning of class to be excused to go to the nurse. I stayed in the bathroom for the whole period, complaining of diarrhea, and when I got out the period was over. Upon explaining the situation to my teacher, she agreed that it was a shame about my sudden attack of intestinal distress and asked me to present my project the next day. I of course did it that night and got an A. I got away with hiding in the bathroom, using diarrhea as an excuse. It seems like it could apply here. If you are suitably remorseful, how could a cop “call your bluff”, and similarly, what are officers supposed to do when confronted by a person who tries to cite urgent needs to urinate or defecate as an excuse why they were not obeying traffic laws?
Thanks,
PD