To make a VERY long story short, my grandmother was born in Canada and immigrated to the U.S. as a teenager, and for a long series of reasons, I didn’t manage to file an application for a Certificate of Canadian Citizenship until right after the 2020 election. (I had major issues lining up documentation showing that the person on her birth certificate was the same person who gave birth to my father; my father was largely uncooperative the many, many times I asked him about it, largely because he didn’t see the point, and I assumed, rightly or wrongly, that he needed to apply first; etc.)
Because my father and I were both born in the United States, that makes me the second generation born outside Canada. I even consulted a Canadian immigration attorney about my eligibility, and his response was that either I was eligible or I wasn’t, and the hard part would be documenting the qualifying family relationship, so why didn’t I just give it a try myself? So in 2020, I did, and (thanks, COVID!), about a year ago I got a response that because of relatively recent changes in the law, I no longer qualified for citizenship by descent as the second generation born outside Canada. (Amazingly, though, they believed my totally insane chain of documentation! And the decision said that it did appear that my now-deceased father was a Canadian citizen - something he never cared to bother with.)
Fast-forward to December, when a pissed-off judge in Ontario issued the Bjorkquist decision, which the Canadian government decided not to appeal (and the appeal period just passed, anyway). It’s interesting and totally worth reading, at least if you are an immigration and citizenship geek like I am - basically, the judge ruled that preventing Canadians born outside Canada from transmitting citizenship to their children at birth violated the Constitution because it discriminated based on gender and national origin. (The pile of arguments were actually much more nuanced, but that’s the gist of it.) She ruled that, among other things, a) the relevant portion of the Citizenship Act as amended was null and without effect; and b) the nullifying of the portion of the Act would be stayed for 6 months to give Parliament the opportunity to come up with something better.
So my questions are:
-
Am I understanding this all correctly?
-
What is Parliament likely to come up with and actually pass? It looks like the current proposal would involve requiring that Canadian parents have lived in Canada at least 3 years before the birth of the child in order to be able to transmit citizenship, and if that’s what ends up passing, then I won’t qualify - my dad never lived in Canada.
-
Even the Canadian immigration lawyer I spoke with said trying to figured out who was grandfathered for what gave him a headache, and I concur. Any thoughts on whether I would be grandfathered if I reapply now? Current processing time is being quoted at 8 - 9 months, so Parliament will either have come up with something new by the time anyone looks at my application, or they won’t.
Feel free to share any other thoughts on possible scenarios - I will likely just reapply because it’s not crazy expensive ($75 CDN plus photos, postage, and photocopying) and I already did most of the work on my initial application. I’ll probably just tweak the supporting genealogical documentation to add/replace with some newer things I have found in the interim. And I guess it’s possible that different categories of people will be treated differently depending on dates of birth, people who apply before or after new legislation is enacted, etc.
Thanks, folks!