See subject. I ask because at least this guy in 1988 couldn’t [cite]:
In 1946 W.J. Cunningham was midway in his first year as a professor in Yale University’s electrical engineering department when someone gave him a Magi-Koil … [renamed] the Slinky … Forty years ago Cunningham had printed a paper quantifying the actions of his intriguing new toy [in May/June 1987 American Scientist]… [now] he denigrates his earlier self-assurance, now that he is “less sure he really understands all that goes on.” …
In an interview he elaborated on the problems. “The general idea is pretty obvious, but even with all the physical measurements I wanted I couldn’t tell you the minimum height of step to kick it off on a walk down the stairs.” It’s tied up with the damping in the spring, which is hard to measure to begin with. “What’s clear is the larger the damping in the spring, the larger the step height, and I can tell you how long it will take to go down the step. But working from first principles I have not been abe to set up a predictive mathematical model.”
(Personally I think the author of the article, who shares one of my usernames, should have written “deprecates” instead of “denigrates,” or have said it simpler with an extra word or two.)