Sorry for chiming in late here; I wasn’t surprised to see a Pit thread here, as this is one of the hot topics of the week.
I would like to say that I’m pleased with the proportion of people who are defending the Cardinal’s statement; I’m sorry to say that I didn’t expect this much support.
I think some points should be clarified. While I don’t have the Cardinal’s statement in front of me, I think it’s essential to notice that he does NOT appear to be saying that Sadaam shouldn’t be brought to justice. There’s a fundamental difference between justice and mercy/compassion, and they’re not necessarily mutually exclusive. Consider: if one of your kids is disobedient, you, as a parent, have an obligation to reprimand him. That doesn’t mean you don’t feel compassion for your child; if anything, your love of your child is what inspires you to correct him, so that he won’t repeat the behavior.
Not to make light of the situation, but Sadaam was somebody’s baby once. Hell, given the right circumstances, the proper wealth, and some poor decisionmaking, and any one of us could have been a ruthless dictator. That’s the amazing thing about humanity: we all have the capability to be the best or the worst of us.
One of the cornerstone points of Catholic social teaching is the concept of the dignity of the human person. (“Dignity,” I realize, may have different meanings to different people, so the short of it for this discussion is that people are people, and must be treated as people, not as objects. To illustrate: a homeless man still has dignity, even if he’s forced to beg in the street in rags. We might consider it “undignified” in the conventional sense of the word, but he still has dignity in that he’s a person. It would be wrong to, say, laugh at the man for personal amusement, or kill the guy to reduce the surplus population, because it would treat him as a means to an end rather than as a human individual.) It’s understood that human dignity is inalienable (note that the Declaration of Independence and the UN Charter agree with this): it can’t be bartered, sold, or stolen. People are people, and must be treated as such.
Sadaam was a very bad man, and must be brought to justice. What the Cardinal may be fearing, however, is that in our zeal to do so, it may be turning into a personal quest for revenge…which is understandable in light of his atrocities, but still not acceptable. (On that note, I’m pleased that President Bush is holding himself in reserve: he’s been candid in his opinion that Sadaam should be executed, but he’s also been clear that it’s none of his damn business what the Iraquis choose to do with him.) The Cardinal may have been concerned that, by putting Sadaam on TV and displaying his teeth being checked, we’re coming closer to parading him through the streets as an object to satisfy people’s bloodlusts. I would agree that the statement was premature: the tooth check was necessary and didn’t seem improper to me.
On the other hand, given how many people I hear on talk radio calling for Sadaam not just to be executed, but to also be run through a shredding machine, I do worry that personal cries for vengeance are being confused with justice.