Dude, if there’s one job you don’t brag about having, it’s being a public defender!
As long as you’re not on it, I think we’ll survive.
Also, for all the posting you’re doing here, there are tax cheats and throbbing burritos crying for your attention.
With scrotums on one end or, as is increasingly apparent, both ends.
Oh, horseshit! If you could answer the arguments, you would, your hunger to be taken seriously is embarrassingly transparent. Failing that, and failing miserably, you attack personalities and posting styles, as if somehow that might make the ugly truth disappear.
You are an impotent man demanding a starring role in a porno movie.
Horseshit yourself. If YOU could answer MY argument, then you would. Instead, you attack what you think my position is onm the larger issue or you attack me personally based on my views.
The problem is that if a poster doesn’t share your views on the larger issue, then you don’t want to hear anything they have to say on the subject even if the larger issue isn’t implicated.
And I couldn’t care less whether you “take me seriously.”. I post here for my own amusement and will stop when I am no longer amused.
Then yours is the most strenuous and bombastic display of indifference I’ve ever seen.
You misapprehend my motivation (which is only one item on a long lis of your misapprehensions). Just because I answer people when they say I’m not a lawyer doesn’t mean I want people to take me seriously.
Also, what’s with all the insinuations that I’m gay? I thought Ýou liberal douches were abpove the common “fag” insult.
Tell you what, you point one out, and I’ll try to explain it to you. Best I can tell, you are accused of being a braggart and a pettifogger, but your sexual preferences are not referenced.
I’ve seen no insinuation that you’re gay. Lucy compared you to an impotent man by way of analogy, but that’s not even really an insinuation of impotence, much less homosexuality.
I’m not.
Fag.
Running dog jackal of the ruling class fag!
Sorry, bubbe. When you get offered a slip at the New York Yacht Club, your boat can talk to my boat. Unless, of course, it’s a stinkpot. (You didn’t ever notice I played the boat card before you, did you? Try harder.)
Luci hasn’t called me gay–I’m talking about the throbbing burrito with a scrotum references.
And Miller I know you’re gay, so your trollish attempt to rile me up has failed.
Man, what a straight line.
Rand, do you see how others on this message board might see this as arguing both sides of the same argument (not the argument in the OP, mind you - Jesus, I’m going to have to spell this out for you aren’t I).
Quote 1 - We should only discuss exactly what is in the OP
Quote 2 - When I want to disucss beyond the OP, you idiots aren’t interested.
btw, luci has you nailed (no, that’s not a gay reference).
I know, I know…liberal douche, too stupid to post here, blah blah blah.
Christ, what a transparent and bad attempt to salvage an argument you lost. Just chalk this one up as a learning experience and move on.
The OP of this thread brings up a side issue (whether there are CCFs and whether it’s bad if there aren’t) of the main issue (the whole detainee situation). I’m saying in boyth of those quotes that it’s OK to discuss the side issue without discussing the main issue. Those quotes aren’t contradictory at all, and you don’Þ make even a passable attempt at demonstrating they are.
You lost this round bud, no big deal. Just move on.
You’re the one who assumed my perfectly legitimate foie gras burrito link was a penis.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, bud.
I guess it’s true: conservatives really don’t have a sense of humor.
Another WIN for Rand Rover! That continues your undefeated streak!
False dichotomy.