I’m trying to get a feel for how good a job people think reality shows are casted, based upon some obvious (to me) selection criteria.
I leave out 1) dating and 2) Big Brother-type shows, because in the case of 1) several categories don’t apply, and in 2) the point is to create conflict, so the most extreme examples of each category are chosen. Plus, I don’t watch them.
The Shows -
Survivor
Amazing Race
Apprentice
The Categories -
a) The Homosexuals
b) The old people
c) The “Characters”
d) African-Americans
The judging criteria is only one thing - competence. Which means, the contestant(s) actual chance of winning the game.
Starting with Survivor
a) Good to great job of casting. Richard Hatch set the tone, obviously, but I also can think of Ami and a guy from the one where Tom won. All smart, cunning, and good players. I can’t think of a single flamboyant gay man of stereotypical butch woman, certainly not by name. Even those closeted or in denial :cough:Colby:cough: are good.
b) Good. Although the oldest person to win was in his mid 40’s (I think), older people have consistently performed well in this show. One guy got cut by a purple rock near the end, the astronaut from the current show certainly had the ability to last, Rudy, others. They are not an automatic early cut.
c) OK. Some have lasted pretty far - Rupert and Johnny Fairplay come to mind, while at least one (Crazy song-singing woman) didn’t even make it on shore.
d) Pathetic. Makes you wonder if Burnett is some kind of Aryan Nations guy. Quitters, whiners, midnight dumpers and food/drink theives. I know that Vecepia won, but she is regarded as the least worthy of all the winners and her strategy of flying under the radar is now widely despised. That being said, I have a sneaking suspicion about Cirie this season. She’s got a lot going on in her head. She wouldn’t surprise me at all.
Amazing Race
a) Horrible. The most stereotypical bunch of fairies, drama queens, and givver-uppers ever seen. Seem to be included only for comic relief.
b) Bad. Even when they are presented in the best light, they prove themselves to be weak and error-prone right from the start. Didn’t one guy need stiches not 50 feet from the starting line?
c) Jury is out. Some really bad (Guido), some middling (Jonathon and his victim). This year has the extremes - The hippies, who could easily win it, and the incontinent screeching women, who were only not last because of a).
d) Very good. At least one (two?) team has won and this seasons team looks formidible. The family team may have been the most likeable team ever, even though they finished last.
The Apprentice
a) I can only remember one openly gay contestant, and he was only OK. So, only OK.
b) n/a
c) Awful. They are so obviously inserted only for dramatic effect. The guitar guy, the freaking-out Subway shop owner, Brent was completely useless. Omarosa.
d) Outstanding. Randal was, if not the best candidate ever, certainly the most qualified. There has almost always been a fully qualified African-American finalist. Omarosa and Subway girl fall first into c).
This is not a comprehensive list, obviously. Feel free to add your own shows or categories - some that might work are:
The Nerds
The Hardbodies
The New Agers