I was diagnosed with SVT five years ago. Since then I have met about half a dozen other people who have also had it. Tachycardias are the result of a “short circuit” of sorts in the electric system of the heart; a connection is made at a particular juncture where connections usually aren’t made. The ablation procedure is used as a way to burn off the extra connective nerve that is causing the short circuit to occur. It is the most invasive option for treatment. There are drugs (verapamil (commercially sold as Kalan) which are about 50% effective in controlling the effects in people) simply not treating the condition is an option too. Some people learn to control it using the valsalva method (baring down), and one person I’ve met actually stood on her head. For some people the symptoms are fairly minor. My SVT would cause my heart to race at about 210-2140 beats per minute. I never had any blackouts, but definitely a head rush. I could function farily well when an episode would occur, but if they lasted for more than 10 minutes it would be very annoying. If it’s more than a passing annoyance for you (i.e. you find it IMPOSSIBLE to function) you should consider treating the condition.
One thing to consider is your age. Tachycardia is likely to stay with you for your entire life (unless you get ablation). If there is any history of heart disease in your family, you might consider ablation more closely. Tachycardia can aggravate other heart conditions (heart murmurs, clogged arteries, etc.). Also, if you are young and you think that at some point in your life you will want to have the ablation, do it as soon as possible. The last thing you want to do is go in when your 75 because the condition has become to unbearable when you could have taken care of it when you were younger. It is rough to have any surgery done, but you’re more likely to bounce back quickly from it when you are young than when you are old. That said, there are documented cases where tachycardia just went away on its own. This is fairly rare though. Another thing to consider is your health plan. If ablation is covered under your current health plan, it might not be on your next. Some insurance companies will look at tachycardia as a pre-existing condition when you switch to them and not cover the costs of the “elective surgery”, etc.
When I weighed all the considerations for myself, I found that ablation was going to be the best thing for me. My SVT was pretty annoying as I could never predict when an episode would occur. I am the only person I know that has had the procedure done… and I had to have it done twice!!! The first time they went in there, the didn’t burn it off the connection entirely. I ended up getting symptoms again after about a month and a year later, after getting pretty mad at my cardiologist, went in again. This time they did five burns instead of one in order to make sure they got the problem nipped in the bud. Unfortunately they also pierced the pericardia at the end of the procedure which can be a very dangerous thing, but healed up okay for me. They said that my case were the worst combinations of complications they’d seen. I’m sure your cardiologist has told you about all the risks involved (they’re fairly minimal), but it definitely was not fun being on the receiving end of those risks. For example, even though the success rate for ablation on my particular tachycardiawas in the 70% to 90% range, I was one of the lucky few for whom it didn’t work. Also, that reminds me that the procedures are slightly different for different kinds of tachycardia. Usually they aren’t exactly sure what you have until they go in there. Once inside the heart, they have the ability to speed up the heart rate and slow it down. It’s really very strange, because you’re awake at the time and they’ll tell you, “okay, now we’re going to speed up your heart” and that’s exactly what they do. Once they know exactly where the juncture is happening, they’ll be able to stimulate the tachycardia. This is how they supposedly make sure that they get rid of the connection. First they stimulate an episode. Then they stop it. Do a burn. Then they try to stimulate it again. If they can’t get an episode going, they consider it taken care of. In my case, it appears that the connection healed back on itself. Just my luck, I’m afraid.
I’m happy to report now that I’m 100% free of SVT. Occassionally it will feel like I’m about to go into an episode (you know what that feels like, I’m sure), but then it won’t happen. It’s a real nice thing to not have to have this annoyance in my life. I would say, for me, it was worth it, even though I had to have the procedure done twice and they had their pericardia-accident. I’m sort of a strange success story, in that sense. My cardiologist was basically so embarassed by the end that he said if the symptoms returned he would refer me to a different doctor.
If you decide you want ablation: MAKE SURE YOU TRUST YOUR CARDIOLOGIST. Ablation is a very delicate procedure. Some doctors specialize in it and their success rates are much higher. Other doctors aren’t as good at it. Ask your doctor how many (s)he’s done, what the success rates have been, etc. Also, if you are still unsure, get a second opinion. This is a major operation we’re talking about here, complete with IVs, bladder catheters (that was the worst part of the experience for me), and all manner of different kinds of drugs that will put you into altered states. Although there won’t be any large external wounds left and it’s as minimally invasive as possible, there are always the chances of problems (the doctors should go over that with you AS WELL AS a third party nurse who doesn’t have a vested interest in whether the surgery gets done or not so you’re CERTAIN of the risks involved).
So, if this is a major problem for you, I would definitely consider the procedure. Feel free to contact me if you have any more questions. Good luck.