Censorship is always a solution

Out of interest, did the rules state “no racism” or “no using these words”? In my experience (granted, apparently not as full as yours) generally it tends to be the words themselves which are banned or censored on online games.

I think I get your point, though I still think you’re being an ass about it (and when I say “ass”, please don’t equate that to adherence to the socio-political theory of behaviour-bodypart linkage). Problem is this; you can certainly decide what you will take from a situation, but you can’t decide what others will take. Point in obviousness; you got banned, and probably will be now from here. If for you “nigger” has no racial attack built into it, but it could get you banned or various bad results for you - I can’t speak for you, but I think I would probably have the debate about it being acceptable before using the word. Seriously, you have no reason not to.

Is this the part where you laugh maniacally while posing with both arms in the air, fingers splayed like claws, while the lightning illuminates your secret laboratory and the monster you’ve created comes to life behind you?

Are you in ROTC on campus?

Neidermayer, is it really you?

Don’t forget that it’s the first day of spring (oh sorry, ahem… the date on which the Vernal Equinox - from the Latin for “the fucking pollen is driving me mad!” - occurs) here in the northern hemisphere. Simpleton…

:wink:

I’m so sorry to feed the troll, but I get the sense he actually takes himself seriously.

Let’s do this.

“substantial” is not a noun in any dictionary I can find. You are adding words to make your point seem more erudite.

Someone claiming your academic credentials should know college does not bring wisdom.

No it does not “mean nigger backwards.” It is “nigger” spelled backwards.

Fucking brilliant.

Do you mean “does”?

“Linear spatial order”?? You could have just said “order.” Why would you add “linear spatial”? Did (do?) you turn your 3-page papers into 10-pagers in college by adding this kind of unnecessary verbiage? Adding smart-sounding words to your kindergarten-level arguments does not make them any smarter.

No it doesn’t. It is the belief that all members of a race possess characteristics specific to that race. There is no judgment implicit in racism. Claiming that blacks are better musicians is racist.

Condones “of” racism? Speak English!

Either false or else poorly phrased. Racism can certainly exist in a system that does not recognize it. See Nazi Germany.

Great. You sat in on the first week of a high-school Theory of Knowledge class. So did we all.

What are you even saying? This clause doesn’t make any sense.

“Truth value”? You’re arguing that nothing that can be measured by a spectrum should be measured at all. You are an idiot who didn’t understand your freshman year philosophy survey class.

You can’t show that anything exists as a universal constant. Your argument would fall apart here, except that nothing was really holding it together anyway.

Keep trying.

Okay, you’ve moving from philosophy to pop sociology, and already messing it up.

My eyes!! The IRONY BURNS THEM! Remember the correct definition of racism? That all members of a race share a particular characteristic specific to that race?

As you pointed out yourself: it’s relative.

Not a word.

Depending on context, this could be true.

My god, you’re dense. You think you’re coming up with this idea yourself? Try reading any of the great civil rights leaders. In fact. I would suggest you just try reading. Period.

You know what, I take it all back. Your command of Latin has floored me.

They changed it to keep out the idiots. Let’s hope it works in this case.

I’m out.

Oh yeah and Randy. How about you tone those critical reading skills. I told you I will not debate my scholarship because it was censored.

Cya.

Oh man, this was exactly what I needed at the end of a long day. Transcendence, I salute you for having provided some good entertainment value, and I hope the mods don’t hit anything TOO sensitive with the ban hammer.
hee hee hee, are you going to tone your skills with your censored scholarship? oh man, this is classic

If I show you my Ph.D., will you shut the fuck up?

I hope you mean it this time.

You said in the other thread that English was not your first language. Are you not from the United States? If so, you may not realize that our social reality includes an extremely long and touchy conflict over skin-color-based discrimination. I do understand that folks in other countries don’t always grasp the gravity of the situation, but, seriously, dropping the N-bomb in this country is the social equivalent of shooting someone in the head. It just isn’t done, and no amount of your not understanding why it offends people is going to PREVENT it from offending people.

(Yes, I know he’s probably gone or sulking, but still…)

More Latin would help too. Preferably Latin that sounds impressive but isn’t used properly.

I aren’t very smart, I are just a high school graduate, I don’t have any of those fancy dee grees. Now I heared that when you when you study philosophy and psychology for about 4 years they give you a BS dee gree. All us boys down at the shop knows what that stands for. Then I heared that if you do some more learning, you get an MS, which I have been told stands for More of the Same. Finally I heared that if you study some more you get a PHD. Roomer has it that this stands for Piled Higher and Deeper.
So which dee gree ya’ll working for boy?

In that fancy college, have they ever discussed the theory of “If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, there is a very high likely hood that it is in fact a duck.”?
You might want to consider that before some very large gentleman of the African American persuasion takes offense at your construct and decides to kick your ass.

Come on. This guy wouldn’t have lasted five seconds on Usenet in the Golden Days. Where are his demands for multiple Nobel Prizes? Where is his ten-page-long screed with citations to the Bulgarian Journal of Eudaemonic Research? Where does he claim to have solved all of mankind’s problems by positing the Universe is, in reality, a plutonium atom? He’s a pitiful little mewling weakling with no heart for the game, and I will be happy to see him gone.

I wish, I wish, I WISH this guy wasn’t a troll! It’s too bad, really.

I remember when I went through a similar stage back in high school. I thought that using big, unnatural sounding words in my sentences was a sign of my brilliance and sophistication :wink:

Lighten up, Francis. :stuck_out_tongue:

Here is where I should come in to say that the really awesome impressive thing is not to come barging in saying you know more than everyone else and to try to show it off, since few things turn people off more. Instead, I should say the impressive thing is to know how awesome you are and never come on so strongly so people realize you’re awesome without you having to tell them. And that even if you have valid and interesting points of view you’ll gain more traction by not treating the people around you like the simpletons you are oh so sure they are.

However, I’ll have a lot more fun if I express the oft-stated opinion that the only thing less useful than an English BA is a Philosophy/Psychology BA.

Also my penis is a lot bigger than yours*.

I do not have a penis.

Hey, Tran, can you please tell us what your *first *language is, so I can read your posts with the proper accent? I think that would make them even funnier.

WE MUST RE-ORBIT X-SOVIET ARMENIA FOR ALL-ONE-GOD P-ADIC TIMECUBE.

Would you be so kind as to post a link to the thread in question? I might love science, archeology and anthropology, but I’m also Pagan. I’m a skeptic in some ways though, so I don’t stick out too badly here. (My point being, there are people of many Creeds here, all sharing ideas, and remaining largely civil.) Seems to me like you just want a fight, and not any kind of conversation with the members here. Here is a thing to think about: those people dressing you down in your topic, are just as skeptical about other things that are non-esoteric. You have to show proofs as to what you are saying to convince them of your points. The recent topic discussing a fat tax comes to mind. I posted this scientific article showing that the BMI is actually outdated.

Right after being utterly and completely torn apart. Good timing.