I am not sure even Ann is willing to risk a statutory rape conviction.
Care to point it out to those of us who aren’t wearing our waders? All I can find is the same deep dish bullshit you spew the rest of the time. Is it one of your cites to some random blog, or is it one of those time where you gibber about some stuff and dodge the real issue?
I’m also pretty sure that her species’ mating process involves a violent death for the other partner. And that’d be, like, a month’s worth of food for her.
I can’t wait to see the reaction from Free Republic. I imagine we’ll see much wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Uhh, this video is from 2009, Guin. I think any reaction FR had, they had it long ago. 
Darn it Leaper, I wanted to see if our “Chump” Champion would miss that, in any case, it is clear that it is worse than I thought, COT just demonstrated to all how ignorant he is even on what Ann Coulter said about guys like him several years ago, for her and other republicans that use their brains, this issue is for losers.
Basically Ann would tell COT that he is one of the few also-rans, deadbeats, defeated, disadvantaged, down-and-outers, duds, failures, flops, flunkees, has-beens, full-of-fail, crackpots, eccentrics, fanatics, monomaniacs, zealots and cranks that are out there.
CoT isn’t allowed to have sex anymore.
One of the moron liberals here wrote:
I’m quite aware of Ann’s dismissal of birthers. It’s a major point of disagreement between she and I. Same for Glenn Beck. With both, my major disagreement is the eligibility issue. Neither has looked into it enough, and fear doing so because of idiots like we have here, who are simply filled with hate and an unreasonable desire to deny reality. People get sick of constant attacks by crazy people (ie liberals).
But I gotta tell you, I still love the woman! She’s awesome at handing liberals their collective asses, and just watching the veins in their foreheads throb at the mere mention of her name is enough to make her likable.
And the new speaker of the house, Boehner (I pronounce it “Boner”) is another one I have an issue with, since he moronically said “If Hawaii said he’s eligible, that’s good enough for me!”. :rolleyes:
Attacker from Dimension Stupid wrote:
I cited proof of it. It’s now your burden to prove that citation inaccurate. In other words, you must prove that I (and the citation I gave) are wrong and that newspaper announcements weren’t auto-generated by the dept of health whenever a birth was recorded (natural born or not).
If you can’t do that, then to hell with you.
Lol, keep fucking that chicken.
You 'mericans are funny.
Nope, that dog will not hunt, you completely missed that I posted the disagreement that Ann had with you before you said to us how compatible you are with her. And in this thread no less.
You were not aware of it, and you are really a fool thinking we would swallow your sorry explanation now.
This is like the classic cartoon by Gary Larson that showed some scientists noticing a group of goofy looking people outside the window (the goofy people looking attentively at the scientists), then one of the scientists says to the others: Yes, gentlemen, they are fools; but what kind of fools they are?
We are just trying to figure out if you are the one that is even unaware of what your “heroes” tell you, or the fool that does not mind how irrelevant he or she is in the real world.
How is that moronic? Why do you hate Hawaii?
Dude. The liberals ARE the woodwork here. You may not find this board much to your liking.
Kyla babbled:
Honey, were you born stupid or did your parents raise you stupid? Show me where I ever said I hate Hawaii. Do liberals like you hear voices in your head or something? No sane person would have any reason to think I hate Hawaii, because I never even alluded to such an absurd notion or posted anything to indicate such a thing. It’s all in your fucked up head.
What is moronic is a politician simply saying “Oh, well the Dept. of Health in a LIBERAL state declared a LIBERAL candidate eligible without properly vetting him, but I believe them”.
And for those fucktards who just hang on my nuts all night, yes, I know those are not the exact words Boehner used. I’m ad-libbing.
Jenaroph wrote:
“A greater hive of scum and villainy” and so on and so forth.
Gigobuster wrote:
I have news for you, moron. I read World Net Daily religiously. Daily. For many, many years now. The Ann Coulter eligibility fallout is OLD NEWS. I knew it long ago. I don’t care. I think Ann is nuts for disagreeing, but I still like how she handles libtards and I love her writing and agree with her on 95% of things. So believe what you want. Clearly you think you’re so all-knowing that you know more about what people think than they themselves do! :rolleyes:
Only a liberal fucktard is capable of such insanity.
But when Obama was running, the governor was a Republican. Heck, she introduced Sarah Palin at the national convention, IIRC…
ETA: And it’s not just the state of Hawaii that declared him eligible (though actually, I’m not sure what role the states play in that). What about the McCain campaign, the FBI, and/or whoever (else) gave Obama his Presidential security clearance? Are you saying that someone who isn’t eligible to be President was cleared to look at the most valuable secrets this country has? If you think there’s a flaw there, it’s not one state’s burden.
Nah, only a fool like you then would admit proudly that he does not mind that he was attempting to mislead others into assuming that people like Ann Coulter agreed with people like you. Just like in your sorry attempts at misleading others with the created quotes from Abercrombie, you are therefore the kind of fool that thinks that it can get away with posts that are falsehoods and misleading in this message board.
Out of curiosity, does your character just automatically consider anything a liberal says to be a lie? Like, if I say that the sky is blue, will you argue with me that it’s green?
P.S. I’m actually really impressed by your trolling, man. I think you’ve actually got some people pissed off!