The Royal Mint has just unveiled the new designs for our money.
There’s a nice high-resolution slideshow of pics here.
I think the new coins are great. I was expecting them to have gone for some kind of horribly trendy and “relevant” set of designs, featuring , I dunno, Tesco supermarkets and hoodies or something, but these designs are classy. The Welsh aren’t happy, of course, as Wales isn’t featured on the Royal Shield, but they’ve had the Prince of Wales feathers on the 2p for 37 years now.
The only downside I can see is that there are no numerals on the coins to help non-English speakers, but then the USA doesn’t have them either.
(And, of course, the fact that there are still 1p and 2p coins in the new range, despite the fact that the penny is worth considerably less now than the 1/2p coin was when it was phased out nearly 25 years ago!)
We have to have them to get our change for all the things sold for £x.99. I s’pose they could have introduced a 99p coin.
I think they’re quite snazzy, though I don’t remember the last time I really looked at a coin. Googling on pound coins turns up at least two designs I’ve never noticed. I’ll have a closer look at my change at Waitrose tonight.
I sort of like it, but I think it would’ve been better if the coins were touching when you assembled them.
I guarantee that comedians on television, comics in magazines and tabloids, and guys trying to win bar bets will come up with ways to assemble the coins so that they produce images that are borderline obscene.
(“I’ll bet 25 pounds I can make a vajayjay out of the change in your pocket.”)
I really want to like them and in general I think it’s a neat idea, but in practice the designs are all so off-centered and incomplete and arrgg…I look at them and immediately am reminded of coins that have been stamped incorrectly and I can’t really get past that.
Interesting! I had not realised that they we being changed. I’m a long time coin collector and, having lived in England, the British coins hold a special interest for me.
I’ve been waiting with bated breath to see these - and I’m afraid I am desperately disappointed. They are absolutely hideous. Just the thing you’d expect from an 11 year-old (OK, so he’s 26 - but that’s bad enough). Sod the pretty pattern they make when you spread them out: who’s ever going to do that?? I give them 5 years before someone at the Royal Mint comes to their senses and quietly replaces them.
It would be interesting to see the designs that the design committee rejected. Sometimes the losers are far more interesting than the winners (like the designs by Publio Morbiducci for the Irish Free State coinage in 1927).
Hey hey hey! I don’t think his age had anything to do with it. Cuz I’m 26, and I could’ve done better. Who the heck thought that was a good idea? It’s just weird and pointless.
If you are referring to this, it wouldn’t be possible, because they’re all different sizes, even though in the picture it perhaps looks like the 10p and 2p are the same.
I also think it is a great idea, but not for a design that will last for decades. It’s fantastic for a special occasion (like the US bicentennial quarters), where you’d like them to have some unique property, but as normal coins, you can’t get over the fact that they look like crap individually.
Within a few weeks of their first circulation, everyone will be sick of arranging them in patterns on their desk, but they’ll still be stuck with funny-looking coins for the next 30 years.