What? I think skirts are much hotter than those shorts. Do most people find the shorts hotter?
I think all the pro teams have a rule that players cannot date cheerleaders. Guess they don’t want players too distracted over 1 girl on the sideline.
Out in India recently I went to a cricket match and was certainly surprised to see cheerleaders…
The trouble with you Premier League lot is not knowing anything about the lower leagues.
http://www.hottestgirlsofcheerleading.com/2008/11/10/southend-uniteds-bluebelles-are-pretty-tasty/
I heartily endorse threads about cheerleaders.
^5
In my opinion, yes. Your stereotypical cheer skirt (not what the Chargers have above) is more there than the shorts that the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders wear for example. Also, more form fitting.
Though as said above, I’m not picky.
Just great! Thank you so much for making me think about Tina Yothers.
No they’re not. Unlike the players, it’s not a fulltime job for 99% of them, and the pay is modest. Some cheerleaders for pro teams are not paid.
Almost all of the schools that offer athletic scholarships give full scholarships to their cheerleaders, one of the results of Title IX legislation.
I had a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders poster hung up beside my Farrah Fawcett and Cheryl Tiegs posters.
I thgouth the original comment meant it was hotter outside, but then Green Bay was mentioned.
To counterbalance that, here’s a picture of Jane Seymour (middle) from the 1979 movie, Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders, co-starring Bert Convy and Lauren Tewes.
The Packer cheerleaders wear both pants and skirts. Then again, the cheerleaders are the UWGB (male and female) and St. Norbert’s College (female only) cheerleaders. We actually have CHEERLEADERS, not dance teams.