Cho v. Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc.

Should I bother?

The lawsuit was so asinine I can’t believe they settled. Looks like there is a cash benefit available also.

http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13455

5% of the cost of a hard drive I can’t recall owning maybe five years ago, or a free $40 dumpware package.

wh00t!

Remember when it was a big deal that the CRT 13" displays turned out to only really be 12.7" or so?

THHHRRRBBPPTT!

[/me releases a Bill the Cat fart…]

That’s ridiculous - Windows and Mac (Until Snow Leopard) were the ones who weren’t adhering to the standard, not Seagate. The Official definition of a gigabyte is 10^9, not 2^30 (a “gibibyte”).

As for the settlement, go for the cash.

From the settlement website:

Apparently, I did.

Oops. I didn’t notice that you had submitted your claim

I’m not quite sure, though, why you would go to the trouble of submitting the claim in the first place, and then come here and ask if you should bother to download the piece of free software that you get for submitting the claim. Seems to me that the time to decide whether you wanted it or not was before jumping through all the claim hoops.

The “official” definition for gigabyte, as an industry term (IEEE), was exactly how Windows and Mac OS used it. Memory has always been measured using the JEDEC standard (e.g., a gigabyte is 2[sup]30[/sup] bytes), as were removable magnetic media. All of the major hard drive manufacturers produced removeable media products that used those standards. They adopted a non-industry usage in order to make their hard drive products seem larger than they were, while simultaneously using the more accepted standard in their removeable products.

In 2000, the IEEE changed their official definition to comply with the SI standard, and the “gigibyte” was established some years later as a way of clearing up the confusion.