I hear the sound of furious Googling. This could be the first serious vetting of a Tea Party candidate!
2nd kazoo ready.
I’ll be standing by on the rimshot, just in case.
Just to put a stop to all the racket, who says I’m a fan of any particular Tea Party candidate?
So when you said supra
you were saying so in complete ignorance of who the stronger and more adept candidates were?
OBVIOUSLY they have good candidates or it wouldn’t support them!
I’ll bet in someone’s tiny little pea brain that was a “gotcha question”, like asking a senator-wannabe about the “Supreme Court”, or a VP-wannabe about “magazines” and “newspapers” and “countries”.
-Joe
Saying that I’m not a fan of any particular candidate at this time in no way means that I’m ignorant of them.
And just for the record, I’m not gonna let you drag me into an argument over them, either.
Anybody actually say that, or did you just make it up so you could pretend they did?
I wouldn’t either. You’ve clearly come to battle completely unarmed, save for your well-worn butt trumpet.
<puts kazoo away>
Take that out, and put it in your pocket where it belongs, you deev!
And giant goats to eat the lichen-monsters when they get out of control. And flying fire-breathing orcas to eat the goats. . . .
So having reviewed the tea party’s candidates, you find none of them to be admirable. A reasonable enough conclusion.
It would be interesting to know just what you think you’re going to accomplish with this dishonest little bit of fantasy.
“Thy rod and Thy staff, they comfort me.”
You obviously see something of value in the Tea Party. The Tea Party is a political movement to elect candidates to public office. It follows that, to be a fan of the Tea Party, you have to be a fan of at least some of its candidates, and take their statements as representative, to some extent, of the movement’s content and agenda. If not, what does represent its content and agenda? On what basis can we definitively say whether it is a libertarian movement or a social-conservative movement or what? On what basis can we predict what Tea Party candidates in general would do in public office? And if you don’t know, why are you for it?
They better not.
Not a fan. She is a fucking joke. How could you dream up a less qualified candidate ?Nobody exaggerates. All they do is tell you what she said. That is scary stupid.
Besides she is pudging up and does not even have cute working for now.
The difference is that Greene is pretty obviously mentally impaired, perhaps even ill, and criticizing him for it is somewhere between merely useless and downright cruel. His “victory” in the primary, given the vulnerable technology used, is highly open to question.
O’Donnell’s just an ignorant fool, unwilling to use the critical reasoning abilities she presumably has. She’s in other words no better than the fools who thought she might be able to actually do a responsible job as US Senator.
And she’s more, um, telegenic. 
Don’t worry about it, she just raised over three million dollars. Since she continually violates campaign laws and uses her campaign funds to pay her personal bills, and she’s moved from chump change to big money, she’ll end up doing time for it soon enough.
At least she’ll probably be able to afford a second outfit for her “speeches”.
-Joe
I can almost hear O’Donnell screaming frantically,
“Recalculating! Recalculating! Please Drive to Highlighted Route!” :eek: 