I just saw this interesting poll in the New York Post. Clinton is listed second behind the ever-popular Hitler. What’s amazing, beside the fact that he was a write in candidate, is that he beat out other swell examples of humanity at its worst such as Idi Amin and Pol Pot. To make it a family affair, Hillary was written in to the number 6 position, beating out such worthy adversaries as Khadafy and Jeffrey Dahmer.
Never let it be said that we Americans lack a sense of historical perspective or proportion…
I guess this just goes to show how stupid polling data can be. I’m no fan of former President Clinton, but to rate him 2nd behind Hitler as the most evil person of all time is just nonsense. Oh well, I guess some people will post anything on the web, and it really screws NYP’s credibility for publishing it.
(side note: I don’t read the New York Post, are they always this silly ? )
Gee, The New York Post, the “worst piece of trash on the East Coast, in fact the whole 48 [contiguous] states.” (Public Enemy)
Rupert Murdoch’s vanity paper. The paper so biased against Clinton they had a restospective on him, and no editorial have anything nice to say. Yet, these hypocrites who dis him benefitted the most from his policies, with a lot of them becoming millionaires in the economic growth.
Ah, the web poll. Perfect example of democracy in action. The same system that awarded “Hank the Angry Drunken Dwarf” from the Howard Stern show the most beautiful person in the world, according to People Magazine’s site, and had Ralph Nader at 70% on the day of the election on Time’s site.