This is the most bullshit, made-up story of the week. So Papelbon wants the ball, so what? Doesn’t ANY good, competitive pitcher want the ball? And his puss-out retraction makes me sick.
For the record, I despise the Yankees, and am no Red Sox fan. No dog in this fight for me.
Furthermore… when MLB made ‘this game count’, they opened it up for strategic decisions to outweigh popular ones. The Red Sox have a damn good chance at making it back to the World Series. If Francona thinks he can gain an edge by pitching Paps in the 9th over Rivera, he should do it.
Making a game ‘for the fans’ and ‘count’ should be mutually exclusive. I almost hope Rivera actually gives up a winning run in the 9th, and the Red Sox end up losing the World Series in 7. That’s show MLB (well, the managers, anyways) how much sentiment they should be putting into a competitive gameplan.
I disagree. The point is that for the sake of the fans, the managers should manage as if they intend to win the game. If the managers are attempting any other purpose (i.e., protecting players for “real” games, displaying hometown favorites) then the game is less entertaining. This is an incentive to the managers to not burn through the roster overly quickly, like they did in the 2002 tie.
The game’s in New York. Last year of the most storied stadium in baseball. You think the fans there want to see some guy from Boston closing the game, instead of (arguably) the greatest closer in Yankees history and the game?
Yes, and most of them know Rivera should be closing out the game no matter what the score is. This is a no brainer this time and wheresgeorge04 is correct, this was a bullshit non-story in a slow sports week.
BTW: This is reminiscent of when A-Rod moved to 3rd so Ripken could play one last All Star game at short in his final season. Except of course that Rivera is actually just as good as Papelbon so these decision is even easier.
Quite frankly, as a Royals fan I’m a little miffed that Papelbon thinks he’s the one who should be considered for the closing spot vs Mariano Rivera. Joakim Soria has been almost perfect as a closer this year, better than Papelbon.
I don’t really care what Papelbon said, but the simple fact is that Mariano Rivera is the best closer in baseball, hands down. His ERA is 1.06. He has pitched more rinnings than Papelbon, given up fewer hits, fewer homers, fewer walks. This is not a one year fluke; he is, in terms of his ERA relative to his competitors, the greatest pitcher in the entire history of major league baseball to pitch a substantial number of innings. It is something to say that Rivera is better than Joakim Soria, because Soria has been ridiculously awesome, but it is so; Rivera has been better.
So Rivera is the best closer ever having one of his best seasons. I cannot think of any baseball fan with his head screwed on straight who would not admit Rivera is the best closer in baseball right now, the best ever, and the best man to have on the mound when the game’s on the line.
Just want to clarify - I was not saying that Soria is better than Rivera (this year or career) but that he’s better (at least this year) than Papelbon. I’m annoyed by whoever out there (manufacturing the “controversy”) is thinking that the only options are the New York option and the Boston option.