Maybe if McCain went over there dressed up as Quinn the Eskimo…
You are a dipshit. (By the way, did you yet figure out which Dawkins book it was that you’ve read? I’ve been waiting in the other thread for your answer.)
It wasn’t a panel that Novak walked off of, it was one of their he said/she said shows. If you think these shows have any bearing on describing what has been the bias of CNN, you’re even more of a dipshit.
Blitzer hasn’t been calling them on anything. Cafferty has, through his little window over Blitzer’s shoulder. When he does, Blitzer pretty much has nothing to say, or will make some modifying (and mollifying) sort of comment.
Barbarian, you do realize that your saying things are so doesn’t actually make them true? :rolleyes:
I just want to chime in as someone who just finished another year outside of the green zone (what we called the pussy zone) in Baghdad to state once and for all: Baghdad is crazy dangerous, outrageously dangerous, I knew an American who spoke fluent arabic and traveled around by cab in Baghdad and we called him dead man walking, he very nearly earned his nickname and doesn’t do that anymore.\
No unarmed or unprotected American is going for a stroll in Baghdad outside of the pussy zone, it is fantasy.
Hold off on that. We may not get to say the “E” word anymore.
And this, coming from someone with your location listing! :eek:
"All right, but aside from that, what have the Romans done for us?
You might want to refer to me as Hentor or HtB or some such, like most people do, in order that you don’t confuse me with Barbarian (who is less so than I am).
And as to your “point,” yeah, I’m expressing my opinion. (Except that I think it’s a pretty solid fact that you’re a dipshit.) What, do you think you are stating facts when you talk of the bias (or lack thereof) of CNN?
Still no idea which Dawkins book it was that you read? To tell the truth, I doubted that you did read one, and I think you’re avoiding a response because of the embarrassment that would follow from acknowledging as much.
Here’s CNN’s John Roberts piling on McCain in an interview. Again, I don’t mind them actually questioning the validity of such claims, but I do hope to see them challenging and following up on all such claims, not just those from certain people.
Madman. You would dare the wrath of the Lost Boys? Incite the anger of Pan?
That would be utter folly.
Isn’t Peter Pan the Queen of spades in the USA Most Wanted deck of cards?
Read my post again. If as a reporter you can refute something using facts, do it…it’s your job. Punctuating your report with editorial comments is unprofessional, even if part of your audience wants to hear it and thinks that public opinion won’t be swayed unless viewers are led by the hand to a set of beliefs.
And in other news, a Hollywood starlet is a little bit pregnant.
Believe it- this incident will be used by the Right to undermine CNN’s credibility.
Ah, this is the problem. You think that fact/editorial is a clean binary. I don’t think so. It’s a little gray. And the comment that being way off-base on the basic facts of the situation in Iraq hurts McCain’s credibility is far closer to the side of fact than editorial.
Since when did the Right become selective in what it regarded as evidence of a liberal bias?
The cite reports that McCaffrey talked to Petraeus and 15 other Iraq commanders to get the facts for his report. He also briefed people in the White House yesterday. His assessment was bleak, presumeably based on the word from Petraeus et al. Yet this morning Bush gave his usual “we are making good progress” blather, presumeably based on word from Petraeus et al.
I’m reminded of Herbert Hoover in 1931 continuing to insist that “Prosperity is just around the corner.”
When a reporter makes cracks about a politician’s credibility and suggests that he is coming from Neverland, it’s not a “gray area”.
Unless you’re in Neverland yourself.
Have a good time there.
or Kevin Bacon’s character in Animal House at the end saying “all is well, remain calm”
So, under what factual circumstance can a reporter say that a politician has said something that is entirely fantasy? None?
What have the Dutch done to us?
(I’m joking, but all this banter about invading Neverland reminded me of this: We often get Dutch visitors to our office. On one occasion, in regards to a woman from Holland, one of the women in our office left a note for our IT guy - “That girl from the Neverlands needs help with her computer.”)
The right already thinks CNN is a liberal outlet. I also know people who say MSNBC is a liberal outlet, and probably any other news source you can think of.