I love it. Did you beat your wife with a belt or with your fists?
How about “The Trump campaign didn’t request the actions and didn’t know about the actions”. Is that a possibility, you think?
Perhaps because current profits tell us little about the network other than its profits are up.
Is the networks future infotainment based? Serious news based? Is it a future of ridicule followed by loss of viewership? I think these are reasonable questions.
This makes the opposite point that you’re trying to make. Lying at Fox News is a regular part of the job, so no one would be fired for it. They don’t hold people accountable for bad journalism because their mission is bad journalism.
When CNN’s staff fucks up occasionally, they’re punished and the stories are corrected and retracted.
Fox only fires someone if their sexual harrassment entanglements cost the network dollars.
In your opinion, what is the single best outlet of news that you know of?
CNN and Fox will both survive their pratfalls.
CNN has pratfalls; Fox’s entire business model is a slip-n-slide.
You misspelled “Democrat Party”.
You left off my previous point that we already have pretty good evidence that the Trump campaign knew about the Russian leaks before they happened. I consider your scenario a remote possibility, but I should have mentioned it.
No, we don’t.
That certainly settles that! Any questions?
Well, “we” do, but Okrahoma is clearly Donald Trump. As the top story on CNN right now says, Trump refuses to listen to any talk of Russia still being a threat to the USA.
Please. How many plainly false conspiracy theories has Fox floated over the years? You’re not helping your point.
But then, I don’t think it matters to you whether it’s logical or not; you just know it’s true.
I made a mistake in thinking this could be a debate. Off to the Pit.
[/moderating]
It must be exhausting to be so stupid.
Tell me, what was the penalty for Fox having a greater than 50% pure bullshit content for the last 20 years?
In 2015, only a mere 21% of Fox stories checked were True, or Mostly True. 18% Half True and a whopping 60% Mostly False, False and Pants on Fire.
If you think Fox is telling you the truth and you’re attacking CNN, you’re a partisan ass.
It’s vaguely tragic that natural selection doesn’t impose greater penalties for stupidity - we might have bred it out centuries ago.
He obviously wants Trump inside of him, but it’s unclear whether it’s gone that far.
I want to go on record right now as saying Trump in France for Bastille Day will bring out some serious loonies.
I didnt derail the thread, someone else did.
Here’s some more proof (and I forgot to ask…which “heavyweight Democrats agree on this”?):