Colibri's insult in General Questions

[Colibri]

You conveniently refrained from quoting the exchanges that had taken place before that. Why did you not quote these as well?

@UberArchetype

That was determined a long time ago when classified information turned up on her server. Those 2 things are mutually “inclusive:” Classified Breach + Unclassified Server = crime. It is simply, IAW 18 U.S. Code § 798, ILLEGAL for this to happen in any way, shape or form:

The Law

Exactly who did what, when and how needs to be “determined” before indictments can be made.

@scr4

Originally Posted by UberArchetype
That was determined a long time ago when classified information turned up on her server. Those 2 things are mutually “inclusive:” Classified Breach + Unclassified Server = crime. It is simply, IAW 18 U.S. Code § 798, ILLEGAL for this to happen in any way, shape or form:

The Law

Exactly who did what, when and how needs to be “determined” before indictments can be made.

From your link:

Quote:
Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

Her server isn’t an unauthorized person. So it sounds like there’s no proof of the law being broken unless it can be shown that the information on her server was accessible by unauthorized people?

@UberArchetype

Originally Posted by scr4
…unless it can be shown that the information on her server was accessible by unauthorized people?

By definition, this IS the case.

@Colibri

Originally Posted by UberArchetype
That was determined a long time ago when classified information turned up on her server. Those 2 things are mutually “inclusive:” Classified Breach + Unclassified Server = crime. It is simply, IAW 18 U.S. Code § 798, ILLEGAL for this to happen in any way, shape or form:

That’s not correct, per the law you quote. It’s not all classified information that’s illegal, it’s only certain categories of classified information.

@UberArchetype

Whatever.

[QUOTE=scr4]

Originally Posted by UberArchetype
By definition, this IS the case.

You mean definition of “unclassified server”? What exactly is the definition?
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=UberArchetype]

Originally Posted by scr4

You mean definition of “unclassified server”? What exactly is the definition?

Anyone’s education on the rules and laws pertaining to U.S. Government classified material at the expense of my time, is over.
[/QUOTE]

UberaArchetype made some erroneous statements. When these were pointed out to him, he basically stated that he didn’t care if they were correct or not. If someone doesn’t care whether the information they post is correct, then they are not contributing value to GQ.