There are times when I really start to wonder. Let me start with some caveats.
I studied for two semesters at a small college in Chicago, back in '85 (which was when I first came into contact with the SD). As a student, I had to have a student visa (called I-20). There was some paperworks, but 18 years later, my memory is a little hazy. I had to send in papers regarding what college, have a return ticket, show that I could support myself during my stay ASF. All pretty standard stuff. Back then, anyone travelling to Sweden had to have a visa.
I’m not trying to dictate how the US conducts its policy regarding this matter, but I just talked to a friend, and was really upset about what she told me.
For three weeks now, she’s been witing to get her I-20. The US embassy in Sweden has informed her that they’ve tightened up security since 9/11, and that there are a lot of forms to fill out and a lot of questions to answer. Among them:
- Current employer and name address and contact person with the three previous employers.
- All education, going back to kindergarten.
- Name of parents, and siblings.
- Name of clan or tribe (if applicable)
- All travels to countries outside Sweden during the last ten years.
On top of that is a personal interview with someone in the staff at the embassy in Stockholm.
So…? you think.
We have our reasons, here in the goode old US of A. If you don’t want to come here and study, stay the hell out.
But this is where it gets interesting. My friend, Maggie, will attend to semesters at a college in Atlanta. Because of this, she’s been up to her neck in red tape for a long time and is still waiting for her visa, even after school’s started.
However, if she wanted to go as a tourist or for doing business, then she wouldn’t need a visa at all. You see, Swedish citizens fall under the Visa Waiver program. The only reason she’s been subjected to the same treatment as someone coming from a potentially hostile country, is that she’s going to the US to study. And we all now how students are, don’t we… :sarcasm:
What the fuck is wrong. If a Swedish person would want to do some henious terrorist act in the US, she or he could just go there as a tourist.
I know and understand that 9/11 hit hard. I realize the need for tighter security, but isn’t this bordering on the ridiculous?