Suppose, strapped to the guerney, the condemned confesses to another unsolved murder (and at least knows some details about the case when asked, to make the confession seem plausible). What then typically (if this has ever happened—I suppose it has) happens? Does the execution go ahead as planned, is there a stay whilst this is investigated, or what?
It goes ahead. There’s no reason to stop it. If the killer’s guilty of the murder, he can only be killed once. If he got a stay in order to investigate the claim, everyone just about to be executed would confess to any damn thing.
I like your logic, but I’d like a cite even better (says the guy who posted an incorrect WAG in another GQ thread just a few minutes ago. Which one is the “hypocrite” smiley? :)).
The night before he was executed, Ted Bundy confessed to several murders he had not been charged with. It didn’t change anything.
Didn’t he postpone execution for some time by confessing to additional murders, though?
It does matter in cases where someone else has been found guilty of the crime.
Eric Cooke confessed to murders that others had been convicted of, but his confession was ignored for about 40 years. Fortunately no one was mistakenly hanged for his crimes.
No. Bundy confessed to eight murders for which he was the prime suspect but had never been charged. He also offered to reveal the location of some of the bodies of victims that hadn’t been found if his execution was delayed. The state declined, and he asked the families of the victims to write letters requesting a delay. They all declined as well.
Thanks. Perhaps I have him confused with someone else.
Bundy also confessed to a few murders where he hadn’t been the suspected killer. He use to go trolling for victims, driving miles and then picking up female hitchhikers solely for the purpose of raping, torturing and killing them. He gave details that convinced the police, who looked up the unsolved crimes after he was executed, that he was the killer.
This is kind of similar to a soap opera I watched. The woman was in prison in one state and was given the death penalty. So she broke out of prison and was captured in another state without the death penalty, so while in prison she killed another prisoner and thus had a stay of execution while she was tried and the non-death penalty state refused to extradite her to a death penalty state.
Thomas Neil Cream was hanged for the murder of prostitutes in England in 1892. His last words, as they pulled the trap, were “I am Jack…”
Speculation that he was going to say “The Ripper” abounds. I guess that pushes the definition of “just before,” though.
He poisoned them which doesn’t fit Jack’s method.
Escape from death row is well nigh impossible. Here in California, there are in a separate cell block with quite a bit more security.
Sorry for being off the topic of the OP, but…
Though widely repeated online and in some books, this is highly unlikely to have actually happened. A good percentage of the stories and anecdotes related the Ripper murders were simply made up, and this is almost certainly one of them.
More importantly he was in another country and in prison at the time of the Ripper murders.
She was being transported to the prison where she was going to be executed and the car ran off the road knocking the drivers out while amazingly she survived and managed to get out of the car.