You start another thread. Obvs.
I think I’ve spotted the problem. You appear to be locked in an endless argument with Popeye. Or possibly a potato.
Unfortunately, you also appear to be losing.
Always a bit disappointing to find out the people you admired when very young are really just glib assholes.
Evel Knievel was not a glib asshole! Just a regular asshole, apparently.
Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as sloshed as Schlegel. I was crushed.
All the subjects in the OP 's rant are beyond both his and the sorta uncles influence. Therefore, your opinion does not really matter . It does to you, obviously, but not to the issue at hand. To get worked up about it, well who has the time for that?
Evel Knievel was not a glib asshole! Just a regular asshole, apparently.
Point taken.
It’s been going this way with my dad, as of late. When Snopes became “leftist,” I figured there wasn’t any point in talking about that any more.
I had a Facebook friend link to an article that off-handedly referred to the “left-wing website Factcheck.org.” I had to point out to my friend that even his own sources are admitting that the facts are liberal.
You could send your erstwhile role model the URL to this thread and invite him to join the board. I’m only partly kidding.
Snakes are ducks?
Well … who knew?
No, crocodiles are, remember!
Snopes is run by a bunch of communist pinkies who helped get Obama elected, with the help of the Russians and the Chinese, to ruin America.
Snopes' Liberal Agenda - Not the Ultimate Source of Truth
Snopes.com is a secret tool of the Democratic party to promote...
Actually, the last one debunks it. It seems kind of like a Snopes-type site. I haven’t looked through it enough.
I don’t get Smurf’s game here. Providing conflicting sources for a statement which sounds almost laughably satirical?
This has to be a whoosh.
Gee, ya think?
Smurf’s shtick, as best I can figure, is to just say the opposite of whatever the majority opinion in the thread is. Sometimes it’s funny, more often it’s trolly.
I think the point of that post was to show on one hand “This is a thing that exists” and on the other “this thing that exists is also incredibly dumb”.
I don’t get Smurf’s game here…
Usually Candy Land, but using a Risk board. And cheating.
Smurf’s shtick, as best I can figure, is to just say the opposite of whatever the majority opinion in the thread is. Sometimes it’s funny, more often it’s trolly.
Depends on what kind of day he had after getting a load on and going out to score Sudafed.
So… yeah, he just pulled out Gary Null. I don’t even know why I’m posting this. Half “point and laugh at this guy” and half “feel bad for me because my friends are stupid motherfuckers” I guess.
Didn’t Stephen Colbert say “Reality has a liberal bias”?
I got stuck in a waiting room with a CT. His rant was that the Gumment was engaged in an ongoing program of disappearing people they didn’t like. His proof?
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! THEY’RE COVERING IT UP, CAN’T YOU UNDERSTAND? THE LACK OF ANY EVIDENCE IS THE PROOF!!!
I’ve been led to believe the true wing nut uses green ink.
I would have had some fun trolling him.
Didn’t Stephen Colbert say “Reality has a liberal bias”?
I got stuck in a waiting room with a CT. His rant was that the Gumment was engaged in an ongoing program of disappearing people they didn’t like. His proof?
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! THEY’RE COVERING IT UP, CAN’T YOU UNDERSTAND? THE LACK OF ANY EVIDENCE IS THE PROOF!!!
I’ve been led to believe the true wing nut uses green ink.
Yes, in the sick mind of the conspiracy theorist, a lack of evidence is evidence. This is a circular argument that makes no fucking pretentions towards sense.