Conservapedia. The "conservative" answer to wikipedia.

Sort of like a Landoverbaptipedia?

Be funny if that were true. Then lefty social vandals could sneak in idiotic misinformation and snicker when their ideological opponents blindly parrot it back to them.

“Carbon dating does so work because all the little carbon atoms fall in love with each other and stick together! I read it on Conservapedia!”

The website isn’t working for me! :frowning:

Oh, but Encyclopedia Dramatica is hysterical!

I believe it’s a great big whoosh.

Oh, you’ve no clue. do more poking around on that site. There’s some really funny shit there. Look at the photoshopped pictures they have.

Later is now, my friend! Have a look at the page on The Truthiness of Evolution. What starts as a simple point/counter-point page devolves into a knock-down dragout between people arguing, losing any sort of encyopedia-ness. Kind of like Great Debates without the awesome.

Seems serious to me

OPEC

:wink:

Hey, we’ll have none of that deviant codding around here. You get lake trout like everyone else or nothing!

Ok, too funny. Decided to look up pagan for my pagan friend and found this entry…

Pagan:
A pagan is someone who beleives in false gods. The First Commandment is, Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.

Most pagans are ancient, like the Greeks and Romans, but there are also modern pagans like witches and Muslims, who do not beleive in Jesus.

I find this site rather amusing actually.

How about this gem:

“Others have pointed to the pagan roots of various Muslim prohibitions, such as the ban on pork originating in the 3rd-century AD Damascene cult of the pig-god Jamal.”

Link

A serach of Wikipedia for “Conservapedia” brings up a single hit on the Eagle Forum with the statement

(I can’t help feeling that at least the last sentence is a sign that someone is having a bit of fun.)

Did we break it with overload? I can’t get to it except as cached Google links.

Funny, when I saw the word ‘Homosphere’ I thought it was a new fairy-tale Uber Christians told their kids. You know, the one with the floating silver ball with blades on the end that floats around church hallways and attacks little kids who don’t pray to Jesus enough.

Don’t get me started on the Priest/Minister/Tall Man. :eek:

“Boy…!”

Wow, that’s like, over 4,500 years.

I can’t get to the page – I googled it and tried to get in from every link on the first page of entries, but the server must be down. I think it may be the most successful sabotage of the extreme right ever. That’d be great – the Steve Colbert of online encyclopedias!

It would be nice if Wikipedia had some editing oversight, though. I’ve heard that it’s been suggested, but it would cost too much, etc. Still, it’d be nice to have a living, dynamic, and FREE online encyclopedia that one could unequivocally depend on.

Ha. I think we broke it. I can’t get into the site either about the truthiness of microevolution.

Crap, does this mean I have to change my Sig?

But… but… the Greeks are Christian… and the Muslims believe in Jesus (well, they believe he existed, and he was very important)… and… head explodes

I wonder what the page says about Catholics? :smiley:

They should just have one page called La La La La La I Can’t Hear You. Every query about evolution, science, physics (and therefore mathematics), any literature after the fall of the Roman Empire, geology, history, any non-European non-American country, any alternate religions, or anything that uses reason or common sense should redirect to that page.

Let’s start a betting pool on how long it takes for Conservapedia to collapse under the weight of all the alternative varieties of religious dogma it has to support. Instead of “the neutrality of this article is under dispute” it should read “the supporters of this viewpoint will be excommunicated and sent to HELL!!”

Maybe some of these could be adapted? (Possibly mildly NSFW, for especially strict values of W)

Much like the CreationWiki. In a nutshell:
Creationism = Good
Evolution = Bad