Here ya go!
Freedom of expression is the First Amendment.
Guns’n’stuff is the Second Amendment.
Two is bigger than one, so the Second trumps the First.
If that is what passes for liberal humor, no wonder…well, I’ll just stop there.
I don’t need to point out what part was fantasy. The whole thing was fantasy. Of course, that part sailed right over your heads. But hey, it was an opportunity for you to trot out some lame insults that a third-grader would have found lacking. Please don’t let me stop you from trotting out some more.
I know, rite? The joke didn’t even include any racial slurs that you like! How is THAT supposed to be funny?
You’re not fooling anybody, c-hump. You say you come for the lib hunting but you stay for the abuse.
[Monty Python] “Oh, no, the Argument Clinic is next door. This is Abuse”[/Monty Python]
That’s a liberal fantasy I can get behind.
Go chase your imaginary jogger some more.
Protip: those kinds of insults tend to lose their sting when pretty much every single person who ever responds to your posts thinks that you’re the drooling cretin with a less-than-room temperature IQ. Just sayin’.
Self-identified conservatives seem to be in general support of the items enumerated in the OP. No cites needed, as no one (except you, apparently) is taking those statements literally. Are there any that you, as a self-proclaimed conservative, are against?
I’ve got to know the backstory on that one.
Here you go, from the “Stupid Liberals” thread:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=20460559#post20460559
But they’re not racist slurs!
I think this is the right thread for this - this is from another site I hang out at, and obviously one of the conservative boards (found this because it had enough recommendations to make a ‘best of’ list):
I’m tempted to ask how a mass shooting derails national recovery, but the silliness of the presumed response won’t be worth the question. I mean, ‘a deep state plan to repeal the 2nd amendment’ would make some sense as a conclusion from the points he is alleging, but derailing the recovery?
This was the best laugh I’ve had all week. Please add me to the list of people [del]shamelessly stealing this[/del] posting this to my facebook feed, with full attribution of course. (HMS, you’re OK with being called “a clever smart-ass on the internet,” right?)
Recovery from what?
Obama, presumably.
The Trump economic miracle, of course, that inevitable juggernaut of prosperity that can only be stopped by a mass shooting.
The reason being, of course, that after a mass shooting, everything grinds to a halt while we come together as a nation and focus on nothing but how to prevent future mass shootings. Why, it’s a wonder Hillary was even able to run a pizza sex ring what with the busy schedule of gun-grabbing after Newtown.
Hi, Mr. Hump. I want to stop my drooling long enough to ask respectful questions. I thank you in advance for giving us cretins insight into conservative thinking.
Let me start with this question:
*On the present controversy regarding Mr. Trump’s remarks to the widow of Sgt. La David Johnson, who do you think is lying? Trump? Or the widow and her Congressperson?
*
Again, I thank you in advance for your valuable insights.
It’s been almost 24 hours, Mr. Hump. How long do I need to hold my drooling? Don’t you want us uninformed cretins to understand conservative thought?
Many Trump supporters have written that Trump constantly lies and that’s what they like best about him. Should I assume therefore that it is Trump who is lying about the phone call, and that you are proud of him for doing so?