In rebuttal, I’ll quote from the “We need conservatives” why? thread. It’s a great example of the sentiment I want to express; I hope that Una Persson won’t object to its application in a different context:
That sentiment, to me, is the difference between your Mr. Potter and Una Persson’s George Bailey. The people who responded to 9/11 did so not for a paycheck, nor for personal benefit, nor out of obligation. Rather, they did so out of a sense of community and, in fact, the compassion you reference in your point 1. This makes them “more deserving” – although not “better” – than those you mention in your points 2 and 3. Really, it’s that simple.
IMHO, it is right and proper to utilize the resources of the government in return for their actions. Clearly, it’s not the only way to do so, nor is it necessarily the best way. But, IMHO, it is a good way. In fact, I’d say that it’s what community is for; and yes, those who stepped up to contribute for the mutual benefit, health, and welfare of our community deserve to now have us step up for them, if only in this imperfect way.