One of the greatest things about the 'Net, in my far-from humble opinion, is that it neatly makes a lot of labels superfluous. Who knows if someone is really male/female, young/old, black/white, etc. The words and inner person are what counts.
This is purely a guess, but staying anonymous as to race could be a huge relief, y’know? The simple fact is that race is still a defining label to many people. I’d like to think that actual bigotry would be minimal, but it’d still be a drag toting the label as “designated black person”.
If black Dopers choose not to got out of their way to make a deal of it, seems sensible to me. Heck, the discussion here is all pretty generous and well intended. But it’s still discussion! How much more relaxing and valuable to be taken simply as oneself, and luxuriate in the kind of casual acceptance that’s so hard to find otherwise.
Please…I’m not capping down on anyone, or criticizing. This is just an observation. I strongly suspect that black Dopers abound. It’s just that the People Pages really show a very small percentage of Dopers, and there are lots of reasons to not appear there: procrastination, shyness, logistical issues, privacy, etc.
It’s a mistake, I think, to make assumptions based on such a small sampling, that’s all.
Pax, guys?
Veb