School resource officers are really going to have to rethink their approach, now that they see they can be so easily tricked into appearing to use excessive force and getting themselves fired, as Clothy describes, with current techniques.
Clothahump’s opinion based on the facts:
Some folks demonstrate that they are ignorant.
Some folks demonstrate that they are insensitive.
But you stand out for demonstrating that you are both when you make such an obtuse statement.
This is “quite reasonable”?
“[Fields] picked the student up and he threw the student across the room.” - Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott
“She now has a cast on her arm, she has neck and back injuries.” - attorney
And then she cut a “B” for Barack into his cheek.
Wait wait wait-- I’m having trouble keeping up with the new information. If we’re ever going to get to the bottom of this, we need to be careful in considering the timing of everyone’s actions.
Now, did she commit all these assaults on the officer before or after she exploded the recased clock?
Now, now, that’s not nice. You’re going to get Smapti all hot and bothered with that story.
I rather think he’s going to get all confused that some would apparently object to what he perceives as a perk of interacting with the police.
As others have mentioned, he probably considers it a privilege to suck a cop’s dick.
I hope Clothahump returns to advise where in the video he thinks this girl assaulted the cop.
Worrying to thing that people might actually rely on his teachings for self defence.
It’ll be a while. He has to run the video through “enhance” mode a few hundred times.
Especially when he tells them a person refusing to get out of a chair constitutes an “attack.” They’ll be having to defend themselves constantly.
And allegedly breaking an arm of someone ~100 pounds lighter is “quite reasonable”.
Sorry, I don’t swing that way and I don’t condone that kind of behavior from the police. I have said before that if a cop were to demand such a thing of one, it would be prudent for the sake of one’s own safety to comply and then sue the hell out of the officer and the department later.
What if the person has a gun? Do they not have the right to defend themselves against sexual assault with deadly force? Are you suddenly opposed to this right?
Of course they do.
The only plus side is they will defend themselves using such damaging strikes as “not getting up out of a chair”
Which, of course, is a massive negative if they are actually being attacked. “Fortunately thanks to my martial arts training I was able to defend myself by viciously allowing them to throw me onto the floor and drag me around like a rag doll.”
Even if cops die?!
And how well does that always work out? From the linked story:
Don’t be silly. Obviously at that point the cop gets to shoot first in pre-emptive self-defence. After all, they are being threatened by a violent perp with a gun and dangerous sharp implements close to their genitals.