Controversial encounters between law-enforcement and civilians - the omnibus thread

You made a specific claim about me – you said “iiandyiiii has said that having a police force does more harm than good to black communities.”. That’s specific and clear. And it’s something I never said. You’ve found no quotes that support this claim about me.

No, I didn’t say hate, and hate is pretty different than fear. But that wasn’t your original claim that I took issue with.

Why can’t you just admit that you made a mistake? It’s not such a big deal when you say “oops!”.

As for the nuance, it’s entirely reasonable and possible to be highly critical of current police culture, policies, and practices, which harm a lot of people, while recognizing that abolishing police would do more harm than trying to reform and improve them.

So I’ll kindly ask you once again to not say things about me that are false. And if you want to be a decent person, you could apologize for saying false things about me. Not a huge deal when you admit a mistake and apologize for it.

Seconded

I know this thread is focused on American cops gunning down other Americans, but today’s breaking police scandal out of Ireland is another reminder that bad cops and their buddies who cover up for them is a global phenomenon:

*"One incident is highlighted which details an exchange between an operator at the garda contacts centre in Castlebar and a guard who mis making a report following a MAT (Mandatory Alcohol Test) checkpoint.

The report states:

“When asked how many checks he conducted he hesitates and first says 30. He then changes that to 50, before finally telling the operator to ‘put him down for 90’”."*

:smack::mad:

Well, I sure as heck don’t know it, and I’ve read many of his posts. Your summary of his position upthread is a total mischaracterization, but I don’t expect you to admit that. It is reasonable for black people to be fearful of police. I’ve always understood that to be his position. Not hate (although that, to me, is somewhat understandable, too.) I don’t ever recall him saying the police is bad for black people.

All unions have the problem that protecting employees rights can make it difficult to fire bad ones. The difference is that in most professions this means covering up for a person who is watching porn at work or chronically comes in late. With the police it means covering up manslaughter.

This is the stupid bullshit that has everyone in this thread disagreeing with your dumb ass. Fear and hate are not the same things, I don’t care what fucking Yoda says on the subject. The only one using the word hate here is you.

This is less stupid, but far more naive. First, go to any fucking ghetto in the world and ask any of it’s residents if the police make their life better. They’ll laugh at you, I guarantee it. They are frequently the victims of police brutality or corruption, because they are a voiceless people, and the cops know it. I heard stories on the street (and saw scars) that you just flat-out wouldn’t believe. No matter how law-abiding they are, no matter their skin color, no one in a ghetto thinks the cops are making their lives better.

Second, criminals living in luxury aren’t worried about cops, because cops actually do make their lives better. They can afford to bribe the crooked ones, and if that doesn’t work they can afford to intimidate witnesses or make them “disappear.” Hell, most of the upper level criminals I met had at least one cop on the payroll just to run interference if required.

So let’s just be clear here. If you have privilege, wealth, status or power, the cops are probably your friends and are probably working to make your life better. If you have none of those things, the cops are not your friends, period.

Manslaughter is all well and good, but I consider the cops who kill as people who are simply unfit for the difficulties in the position that they are working. They are not capable and trained to handle the stress, and so they end up making a poor error in judgement, one that ends with someone dead at their hands. I think that such a cop shouldn’t have a job, and we should do what we can to avoid such things in the future, but there will always be controversial shootings, there will always be cops that fuck up. We can try to lower the level, but I do not think that we can ever get it down to zero.

Now, it is the cops that don’t fuck up, but actively commit heinous acts against their communities that I have a rel problem with. The ones that plant evidence, or rape people that call them, or beat a man for sitting on his mother’s porch… the list goes on. These are not people who, in the heat of the moment made a bad judgment call, these are people who deliberately set out in the morning to cause someone else harm. These are the ones that can create a situation where having the cops around makes a situation worse than not having cops around. These are the ones that make it so that ordinary law abiding citizens will not call the police when they are victims of a crime, because they do not wish to be further victimized by the police who show up. It doesn’t matter if 90%, 95%, even 99% of the police are good people, it doesn’t take all that much raping to leave a bad taste in the community’s mouth. It’s bad enough when we watch one cop plant evidence to secure a false conviction against a member of the community he is sworn to protect, but several other officers just stand there and watch. It is one thing when an officer mistakes a tennis player for a suspect in a credit card fraud case, tackles him to the ground, handcuffs him, and then lies and says that it never happened, but 5 other officers backed him up on that story. If an officer decides to assault and falsely imprison a nurse because she will not obey his authority, that is bad enough, but then you have his peers not stopping him from violating her civil rights in an attempt to violate someone else’s.

These officers are sometimes caught, and sometimes when they are caught, they are actually held to account, but that’s really not enough to repair the relationship that the police has destroyed with their communities. That they sometimes get caught, and sometimes get prosecuted, and rarely get convicted does not do much good for someone who was just abused by a cop, and no one will believe his story. We have seen that as many as a dozen officers will blatantly lie about what they saw in order to protect their own, how can justice possibly prevail in that sort of environment?

Cops need to stop protecting their own above that of the the community. If they know that there is a dirty cop, they should tell their superiors, they should be honest in their reports, they should testify honestly against them in court. If you are a “good cop” who lies to protect dirty cops, then you are not a good cop, you are a bad cop. As long as the citizens of the community see these thugs in uniform acting with impunity in terrorizing them then community relations will be strained. If you are a cop, and you have raped a person who called you for help (or at all, really), or planted evidence, or beat someone for no reason, then you are doing more harm than good for your community. If you are a cop, and you have witnessed any of this, and not brought it up with superiors, then you too are causing more harm than good to your community. If you are a superior, and you are covering for your cop’s misconduct, you are the reason that there are cops that are doing more harm than good.

If you are a cop who does his job, arrests the bad guys and respects the good guys, then you are fighting an uphill battle to keep your entire police force from causing more harm than good. Your job is made harder by these other cops, your job is made more dangerous by these other cops, your community is made poorer by these other cops. I would like to think that these cops would be the majority, but, as in any workplace, if poor employees are left to continue being poor employees, the good employees either quit or lower their standards.

As far as Steophan’s claims of police causing more harm than good in general. I think iiandyiiii has already defended his position well enough, but I don’t know about MrDribble’s posts. I didn’t know that he had posted in here, and I do disagree with him on quite a number of things. If Steophan wanted to point out the post where he made the comments that steophan claims he made, there is a reasonable chance that I will join in criticizing him, assuming that the post is in any way actually reflective of what steophan is claiming. If that is the case, then Steohpan can continue his argument against MrDribble, and can stop trying to paint all of those he disagrees with the same.

But, going into the idea that police can cause more harm then good, all you have to do is look back through history, all over time and all over the world, where law enforcement was used for the sole purpose of oppressing the population, not for protecting it. As recently as the 60’s I would certainly say that the police were causing far more harm than good to some black communities. I like to think that there are no communities in the US where the existence of the police is an overall negative factor in the community, but I certainly can’t rule it out on a “never happens, can’t happen” basis.

Unfortunately, there are those who like the authoritarian bent, who like the idea that there are people out there with a state sanctioned monopoly on violence, and no accountability. They feel they have a lot in common, so those who the authoritarian oppresses will be those who the authoritarian sympathizer doesn’t like. And that’s how authoritarians get their power in the first place, by only oppressing and harming the groups of people that their supporters want to see oppressed and harmed. The funny thing is, is that once they have consolidated their power, and no longer need the toadying bootlickers, they are the next to go.

While we look for ways of improving the police force in such a way to improve the safety of our communities and the relationship between the citizens and the cops, which would decrease the harm, and increase the good done, the bootlickers are looking for ways of justifying the harm, encouraging and enabling this behavior. As long as people feel that cops are above the law, they will be.
Meh, stupid busy today, that’s probably all I have time for.

To me he lost the right to post here when he made the post admitting he was a Nazi, that he wanted to murder all Jews, and that “Hitler did nothing wrong.” Not sure why people still respond to him after that little outburst.

When did that happen?

I read it in multiple threads, we all did. I can’t be bothered to dig through the thousands of posts he’s written, we know he said it.

Wait, what?

I have the guy on ignore, so I didn’t see that, but seriously, he actually did that?

And people are still attempting to engage him??? :eek:

:smack:

smooth :wink:

Right after the post he made where he admitted that he thought all “colored people” were “thugs” and the police should “cleanse the earth” of them. He’s really letting it all out in this thread.

from Evil Economist’s profile

I wonder who we should believe?

mc

It turns out you can just claim people said something, then refuse to engage them when they demand you back up your claim. I call it Steophaning, after an unnamed poster who admitted, in this thread, that he likes to rape puppies.

Back on subject:

Michael Bennett detained mostly because he was a large black man running away in a crowd, and then released when it was realized he was an NFL play.er

He’s being “amusing”.

Why not just admit you got something wrong? Not such a big deal. You said something incorrect about me, and I called you on it. You might have just been mistaken, and it’s not such a big deal when you admit it and apologize.

Why not stand behind what you said instead of pretending you didn’t say it?

I didn’t say what you said I did.

I don’t get why you’re doing this. Isn’t it possible that you just misunderstood what I said? Is it that important that you must be correct about me that you’re willing to accuse me of dishonesty to cover up for your own mistake?