Garfiel226 posted: “Blue Wall of Silence” != releasing a 54-page report to the public.
I don’t know about the “Blue wall of silence”, but just because a report is released to the public doesn’t it make it the factual account of what took place.
I’ve had the misfortune of being arrested for DWI and the probable cause section in the charging document I was given reflected reality very poorly.
I was pulled over for flicking my cigarettes ashes out the window and gesturing while talking to a drunken friend I was driving home at 3am—the cop’s first words were why “was I motioning him to pass me”?
After he saw the cigarette, I was told I had crossed the double yellow line and the white shoulder twice, and that’s why he pulled me over.
It all went down hill from there, I ranted about this year ago in this thread about refusing a breathalyzer for details: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=322147
To cut to the chase, even after demonstrating in court with photos that this road didn’t have a shoulder or white line that I could have crossed, and the cop saying his flashing lights were not on when I was pulled over, and the prosecutor throwing his hands up in the air instead of giving a closing argument because he had no case—I’ll still got fined for crossing the yellow line, but not guilty of the real charge of DWI.
What BS. But the judge still stuck me with a fine and point. It’s like they had to get me for something to pay the court costs.
He had to have known this cop had made a bad arrest (and probably perjured himself), but I couldn’t prove that I hadn’t crossed the yellow line—so bang.
So, from first hand experience with police versions of an incident, I don’t put much stock in a report exonerating police actions from a prosecutor who is part of what can (sometimes) be an incestuous legal system that may be biased towards the police version.
What “factual statements” were considered and then included in this 54-page report to the public?
I forgot to mention that the fact that my T-shirt wasn’t tucked into my khaki shorts was listed as a probable indicator of my being drunk during my arrest (which didn’t last long in court). That’s grasping at straws, IMHO.
The release of this report may not explain what happened