This seemed like a General Mundane Pointless Debate I Must Share, so here it is. Please move it to MPSIMS or the Pit with my blessing if warranted.
The other day on the plane home from Key West, my girlfriend picked up a copy of Cosmopolitan “for a laugh”. (Seriously–if there’s a market for Cosmo, Tamara isn’t it.) We read the whole thing, and I must say I was frequently amazed. Do women really take this shit seriously?
Some examples, all horribly paraphrased.
–Countless articles featuring clothing and accessories that seem outrageously expensive–$85 T-shirts, $247 casual shoes, $75 breast firming cream (I’m not making that one up)–are followed by a piece on common dilemmas women face, including “I Just Never Seem To Have Any Money!”
–Casual sex. According to this magazine, every woman spends her weekends cruising the bars/beach/whatever for hot studly men to take home and bump uglies with, if they even make it as far as home. I have nothing against casual sex myself, but their characterization of the general female attitude on the subject does not match my experience. Or, in other words, where were all these women when I was single?
–Those “how to please your man” articles–you’ve got to be kidding me. Many of them seem to be some variation on “Make him wait for it. Tie him up and tease him with a feather for six or seven hours. The result will be mind-blowing.” I made a special point of telling Tam that, at least in my case, this advice could not be further from the truth. Other guys can back me up or disagree if they want, but the old Jim Garrison just wasn’t designed to stand at attention for very long. After 20 or 30 minutes, it becomes quite painful, in fact. That isn’t to say that it needs to be the end, or that you can’t come back for another round. In my opinion, though, the idea that a man will have a better orgasm the longer he waits for it is totally wrong.
Other “please your man”-type advice ranged from things I would find mildly amusing to things that would really piss me off.
–An article on “How to bag your dream babe” could easily have been re-written as a fishing or hunting article. I found it to be a slightly less Puritan version of “The Rules”, which the sophisticated Cosmo audience should certainly disdain.
I’m not even getting into the obvious bilge, such as the post-teenybopper prose (clothes that will make you “up your come-hither quotient”) or the feelgood articles on why you should respect yourself followed by 50 pages on why you’re not good enough.
It really all struck me as a joke–if you’d given it to me without the cover, I almost would have thought it was a parody. Does anyone take this seriously?
Dr. J