That’s the video capture card that came with my video recording package. I do audio with my computer and not much else, so astounding graphics rendering is not even on my list of requirements.
I’m assuming D2D is DirectDraw, wedged as it is between GDI and OpenGL.
68559 for my DL380 server (all four processing units are utilized) With a Low score for OGL of 562!
The ALU and FPU scores were ROCKIN! Combined they were higher than my total for my computer listed above.
So what high-scores you’all are gettin’ due to graphics card, I whup ya good in number crunching.
Mark 94034
ALU 9742
FPU 10561
MEM 8768
HDD 7310
GDI 16856
D2D 11187
OGL 29610
This is a Athlon 64 3500+ OC’d to 2585 (235X11), 1 GIG of OCZ PC-3200, ATI Radeon X800XTPE and it’s OC’d some, too (don’t remember how much) and a 10K RPM 72Gb WD SATA Raptor on a MSI K8N Neo 2. I built this rig last year about Thanksgiving, been a dandy.
Just goes to show there’s lies, damn lies, and statistics.
While some of you are just walking all OVER us in total score based on video performance, My server’s turning:
ALU 23168
FPU 24711
MEM 7466
HDD 9463 (RAID5 Ultra SCSI)
So there’s a lotta apples and kumquat comparing going on here.
I got a whopping 22,227 on the work machine. P4 2Ghz, 30gigHD and 256MRam
Got a 0 on the OGL score. Ouch.
I’ll try in on the new Gateway at home. I expect slightly higher marks. 
What processor(s) is you server based on? It’s smokin’, that RAID 5 is killing the Raptor.
I’m tempted to slap a different video card in. Seems like OGL is a stumbling block for this test (and the test does seem to be weighed towards video card performance), the ATI cards are not supposed to be so great in OGL apps. I have an Nvidia-based BFG 6800 Ultra OC that is supposed to be a lot better in OGL than the ATI, but to be honest the ATI has done so well in all the stuff I’ve tried that I never swapped the BFG back in (The Nvidia does have better DVD quality IMHO, it might get tried again, anyway…)
Dual Hyper-threaded Xeon 3.6 Ghz procs. The Raid array also appers to be set up to spew rather than suck data…On my home machine, everything was pretty much 20 MB/sec, on the server, the first large data read was 114 MB/sec.
-
-
- Well, I was robbed (perhaps). If you have multiple CPU’s, the test uses all of them–but I have dual videoscreens, and it only ran the graphics tests on the main screen. If it had ran the test on both screens, would it have registered the same (because each screen would be 50% of the total load) or would my video scores be twice as high?..
~
- Well, I was robbed (perhaps). If you have multiple CPU’s, the test uses all of them–but I have dual videoscreens, and it only ran the graphics tests on the main screen. If it had ran the test on both screens, would it have registered the same (because each screen would be 50% of the total load) or would my video scores be twice as high?..
-
You’re joking, right? You have two screens, but only one GPU (unless you’re running two or more in SLI mode) now, if you reduce the screen resolution to 640x480x32, you might see some improvements too. Although something used as a benchmark should abstract out things like resolution, I doubt this particular one does.
41608 from a Dell Inspiron 5150 Laptop, 2.8Ghz Mobile Pentium 4, 512MB RAM, Geforce FX Go5200
78102
ALU 8299
FPU 8912
MEM 5952
HDD 5850
GDI 13824
D2D 6617
OGL 28648
x64 3500 (no OC’ing)
4GB ram (XP32 only sees 3)
X800XL
SATA
seemed to do ok on the OGL, until 128 objects, but my native res is 1680X1050.
2nd (or 3rd) biggest weiner here.
Mark 68503
ALU 6768
FPU 7178
MEM 6364
HDD 6517
GDI 12670
D2D 7472
OGL 21534
Running:
AMD 64 3000
1GB RAM
Geforce 6600GT
Just as a point of interest, I noticed on the polygon test that the backs for the processors had AMD Athlon written on them…anyone else notice that?
Mark 44308
ALU 6502
FPU 8084
MEM 4376
HDD 5085
GDI 8017
D2D 1662
OGL 10582
Dell Inspiron 6000 w/ 1.7 GHz Pentium M
1 GB Ram
But what does it all mean mean?
i think they had both, a P4 and an Athlon
Overall score was 37299, which ain’t shabby by a long shot. I’ve got a mobile Athlon XP 2400+ running at 1.8GHz (133x14.5) with a GeForce II (Ti4200) graphics card and 1GB of PC2100 RAM. There’s a Raid-0 inside, but basically this is a system that I have been incrementally improving for almost five years now.
It’s still so good at playing the games I own that I don’t see myself upgrading for quite some time – waiting for the 64-bit machines to mature a little, and for PCI-E and Serial IDE to take over their older cousins PCI and IDE. Once the hardware standards for this new generation level out, I’ll be upgrading again.
I could put another 2GB of RAM into it… but why bother?
I could shell out for the fastest 8xAGP graphics card on the market… and be left with a relic!
…and the CPU already requires third-party software to recognize its full potential (my motherboard manufacturer never made a BIOS that supported multipliers of more than 14.5x).
My score is a respectable 86,813.
ALU 10684
FPU 11410
MEM 7418
HDD 7356
GDI 9540
D2D 4454
OGL 35951
P4 3.20GHz
1GB RAM
RADEON X850 XT
I went on the site to see how my machine compared, the top machine posts a score of 21553359!! most of the sections aren’t much better than mine, except he’s got a disk score of 21476691!! without RAID!!??
for poops and grins, i found some ramdrive software and retested:
Mark: 120003
ALU: 8283
FPU: 7810
MEM: 5968
HDD: 48755
GDI: 13898
D2D: 6597
OGL: 28692
so obviously not to hard to game the system here.
Well, I’m not too sure how much to pay attention to this; I was also running iTunes and some other apps.
Mark: 47779
ALU: 8248
FPU: 8803
MEM: 6800
HDD: 4043
GDI: 8782
D2D: 3969
OGL: 7134
Well, this does tell me two things. First, if I’m really curious, I need to run EndItAll and then run this program. Second, maybe it truly is finally time to replace my old GeForce2 GTS. But it’d have to be AGP, because my new motherboard doesn’t have PCI-E (at least, I think all the PCI slots–and I have six or seven–are PCI and not PCI-E.)
Oh, this is an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ running at 2.29 GHz with 1 gig of RAM. It is very slightly overclocked–standard clock speed is 2.2 GHz. Or maybe what it’s telling me is that I need to upgrade to a 64-bit OS. Or that I should really get those two SATA drives I’ve been thinking about and RAID everything that’s currently on my IDEE drive. Though I don’t know what I’d do then with a completely empty 120 gig IDEE drive.
I did manage to find my motherboard. I have no idea if this is a good board on not.
I would have you all beat if the damn software would run on my Windows 3.0, 386sx with 16mb ram and ISA video card.