:eek:
I love the Straight Dope. I learn stuff here.
Thank you for expanding my uh… vocabulary.
How dare you impugn the sacred institution of divorce?!? :mad:
Good point - but while I wouldn’t expect dispassionate fact-stating, I wouldn’t expect most people to outright perjure themselves either. Is there any version of these claims that could be less than seriously creepy?
Isn’t it remarkable how long it take someone to realize that they have sworn life-long love and devotion to the vilest scum ever born?
My bad memory has been nagging me, but I finally remembered which of her videos he appears in, very briefly, at the very end. Suds in the bucket (somewhere at the bottom of this list).
He comes across as quite modest. Maybe he would’ve been a bit more relaxed and comfortable on-camera if they’d just let him be naked and “aroused”. 
Not all of us are comfortable being naked, certainly not being photographed that way. So he was angry about it, whats the big deal?
In the video he seems shy on-camera…not modest persay. My joke was referring to claims made in the article quoted in the OP:
Sadly, when child custody is involved, I have found that many people perjure themselves without a second thought, serving the “higher duty” of getting the kids for themselves.
Of course, that’s not necessarily even “most” people, and of course I have no idea of the specific truth or falsity of these accusations. I’m just pointing out that in all the venues in which cross-spousal allegations of wrongdoing appear, a divorce is perhaps the least reliable as far as accuracy goes.
As a general rule.
I knew people were going to start losing respect for divorce as soon as they started letting homosexuals get them.
I think Schelske is a scumbag, and not just for having a name that’s a PITA to spell. 
But I have to wonder about Ms. Evans’ mindset if she truly equated “good wife” with 'being a submissive sex kitten".
I’m not pushing for a Constitutional amendment, if that’s what you’re suggesting. 
I see no reason to drag in a gratuitous shot at submissive sex kittens.
Tris
That remains to be seen. The allegations refer to hard (no pun intended) photographic evidence that will presumably be definitively shown to exist, or not, soon enough.
Please! Don’t speak ill of the sexually submissive and newly single! 
Does anyone else think she thinks craigslist is his personal site?
I thought the same thing. I could just picture her pouting around the house about how Craig spent his evenings working on his “list.” 
And why hasn’t her lawyer (or anyone in the office) ever heard of craigslist? Or did he hear the name and think “hey, that’s catchy” so make his own personal list ‘o’ names in a word document and call it “Craig’s List.”
I’m also wondering what it means that the child “confronted” him. Did the kid just walk into the room at an inopportune moment? Was there a fight? Did he actually call the kid in to watch? It’s very odd wording.
It’s puzzling. If it’s true, when did it start? How long do you have to live with someone before you know about stuff like this? Did her career keep her on the road all the time or what?
What’s this going to do to the kids? What kind of relationship will they have with their dad? Can a man who likes porn and sex with strangers be a good father?
Should she have filed for divorce without making these allegations? I guess this is a “Won’t someone think of the children?” thing. It’s going to hurt them more than it hurts him. Little Bobby at show and tell: “Here’s a picture of Avery’s dad. He has a hard on.”
I suppose airing his dirty shorts means she’ll have full custody and that visitation will be limited and probably even supervised. Good thing. I feel bad for her but I feel worse for the kids.