How’d we get to be such an irony-driven, afraid-to-be-serious culture? Why are the arts full of self-referential humor and meta commentary? Why is the biggest sin to be a true believer?
Is it the result of the demise of Christianity as an explanatory force? The misapplication of Einstein’s relativity to the social sciences? The bizarre findings of Quantum Theory?
Does all the navel-gazing have a positive impact? Does the mad dictator and the inner city thug, well aware of his “image” and mannerisms, work to avoid being “that guy,” that cliche?
I suppose I’m talking clumsily about post-modernism, from which only two falling towers and 3K deaths could give us (Americans) a brief respite.
Are we talking the dictionary definition or the Alanis Morrissette definition first off?
Brought to you by the fine people at Merriam Webster (www.m-w.com)
1 : a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other’s false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning – called also Socratic irony
2 a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony c : an ironic expression or utterance
3 a (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity b : incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play – called also dramatic irony, tragic irony
I take increasing irony as a good sign, myself. I’m suspicious of “true believers”, since many of them strike me as ignorant rubes locked into patterns of behaviour they’re too lazy to change or improve.
Ironically, I don’t think irony is as omnipresent as the OP implies, since we still have plenty of dogmatic baggage in our lives.
It’s probably because, given a choice between being serious and being facetious, it’s usually a lot more enjoyable to be facetious.
I also see a bit of Evil Clown behind the Culture of Irony’s cause. If you insult somebody and they become Offended, then you are Insensitive. However, if you insult somebody in a sufficiently humorous manner and they become Offended, then they Have No Sense Of Humor and you are off the hook (and actually score some bonus points on your insult).
The thread title may be taken from For Common Things: Irony, Trust, and Commitment in America Today:
(I apologize to Mods if my decision to revive this long-ago thread was ill-conceived. I explain in Note 1 why I did so.)
I stumbled[sup]Note 2[/sup] onto a book, A Tolerable Anarchy: Rebels, Reactionaries, and the Making of American Freedom, by Jedidiah Purdy, whom I’d never heard of. Here’s an excerpt from that book:
Like myself, Purdy might be described as a “radical centrist.” I find this and other excerpts of his writing to resonate with my own philosophy.
My next book order will include at least one of Purdy’s several books, but I’ve read none of them so far.
Note 1.
(a) First step was to Search for other SDMB mentions of Jedidiah Purdy. The quote at the bottom of this post was the ONLY one (1) mention to ever appear in almost 20 years of SDMB history. Really?!?! Approve or disapprove, Purdy may be a better thinker than any dozen random Dopers summed together.
(b) Even if I had read a Purdy book in its entirety, I doubt that I could improve on his ideas or rhetoric. So I can’t start a thread in GD or IMHO.
(c) The issues Purdy raises are far too important for Cafe Society or Mundane Pointless.
(d) I doubt I could think of any 3-word title for a thread on these ideas that was better than “Culture of Irony.”
(e) Hence the decision to bump this old much-too-neglected thread.
Note 2.
(a) The quote that first intrigued me about Jedidiah Purdy was “Our conventional wisdom today is a legacy from dead radicals who risked the impossible.”
(b) I stumbled on that quote while clicking in pursuit of … Ocasio-Cortez dance videos!!
I’m sorry I waited 16 years to answer but, yes, I think the Cap’n, furt and Purdy may be on to something.
I’m a little surprised the 2003 version of me let “Is it the result of the demise of Christianity as an explanatory force?” go unremarked. Christianity has never had any explanatory force.
Thank God this thread was resurrected and you found it. We here at The Dope can’t let a mention of Christianity go unattacked. The irony would probably kill the internet all together.
It’s not even an attack. Religions overall have no explanatory force, in the sense that they offer any demonstrable, verifiable facts in explanation of observed phenomena, i.e. if one asks “where do the stars comes from?”, responding with “God made them” isn’t helpful in any meaningful way. If Drunky Smurf thinks otherwise, I invite him to elaborate.