I’ve never played D&D but I like fantasy fiction and the like, so I saw this movie the other day. Man, did it suck.
However, I think you guys are missing the boat when you criticize it for being insufficiently accurate wrt hit points, spell levels, character restrictions, etc. etc. This was NOT the game. It was a MOVIE loosely based on the game. You sound like Trekkies decrying the use of an incorrect verb tense in the Klingon word for “to stab” in StarTrek V. Get a grip.
The movie sucked for reasons that had entirely to do with movie making. Specifically, the direction was simply atrocious. The actors may have pulled off even the hideous dialogue they were given, with a little guidance, but they were left floundering. I’m particularly thinking of the silly romance tacked on between the dame and the buckaroo, whatever their names were - I forget now. It must be a union rule or something to have that stupid, tired, “after-initial-tension-they-finally-realize-they-love-each-other” scene in every fucking movie made in Hollywood. Even Jeremey Irons started out okay but got ever more hammy as the thing went on. Personally, I think he’s a good enough, experienced enough actor to realize the project was turning into a turkey and he was trying to carry the thing. Unfortunately he ended up emoting wildly while the rest of the cast muttered and shuffled like a high school drama class.
Except for the Wayans guy who was just plain awful. Even unfamiliar with the game as I am, I can appreciate the need for a professional thief to be subtle and quiet just on the grounds of plausability. This guy might as well have tied a string of tin cans to his ankles. But really, I think the worst part about him was that he just WASN’T FUNNY. He played a kind of a Stan Laurel/Lou Costello/Bob Denver/Three Stooges sad sack, but without all that wit and dignity. He was about as entertaining and humorous as reruns of Scooby Doo. I suppose there are people for whom that appeals, but I’m not one of them. I’ll leave that sort of humor to those who enjoy it, and to you I say, Rotsa Ruck.
That mage character shore do got a purty mouth, but was otherwise lacking in interest. Same for the elf with her boobplate armor. And please, don’t criticize this one appealing aspect of her character! The princess would make a good Lolita, but did not make a good princess (was it empress? Whatever. She seemed too young to be an empress).
The dwarf character was okay, mainly because he didn’t say much.
The bad guy with the blue lipstick was a complete enigma, but not in a good way. (Was he a quasi-transvestite? A punk rocker? Very cold?) He needed more characterization, or perhaps less - either would have been better than the confusions of motivation and/or loyalty we got (or did we? I’m not sure). They ALL needed something (like a director), in place of the frenetic, disconnected “plot”. Generally, plots should develop, not just happen.
To summarize:
- Hideous Acting, even from Jeremy Irons who usually knows his business.
- A script that was only involved in the project to get publicity until her big break comes along.
- Okay special effects, although since the advent of computer methods, effects just aren’t special enough by themselves to carry a movie anymore.
- A couple of hot actresses, provided you don’t listen.
And finally, the main problem:
- No direction whatsoever most of the time, and bad direction the rest.