Perhaps we should just look at what has been claimed, and presented as evidence. Now I know that it’s entirely possible that old file footage was used to portray the situation; that seems a regular practice among various media. I won’t debate the merits of that other than to say I oppose it strongly.
I also think that the majority of those celebrating were doing so in complete ignorance of the horror of the events (not that such ignorance excuses them entirely from condemnation).
But let’s just compare :
One man has made the claim that CNN was using file footage to portray the events, in a posting to a message board (apparently), which has since been copied elsewhere (counterpunch).
That footage itself has not been shown, so at the moment (unless someone else has kept the footage), there is no way to verify this independently.
While the student has signed his name, the footage is apparently owned by a ‘teacher’. Despite the fact that the teacher is desparately reporting this to many news agencies, he remains unnamed.
Either the student or ‘teacher’ identifies the celebration as being of ‘the invasion of Kuwait’ taken in 1991. What is normally termed the invasion of Kuwait was done by Iraq in 1990. This is a minor detail, but a potential error nonetheless.
CNN has not made any public response, either because they are unaware or for other reasons.
There is plenty of evidence for the celebrations :
also the picture of the woman posted by elmwood.
An AP article in the Jerusalem Post :
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/09/12/LatestNews/LatestNews.34665.html
Here’s a column which mentions Arafat’s denial of the celebrations (reported in NY Times), and the story on the threatening of the cameraman :
http://slate.msn.com/code/chatterbox/chatterbox.asp?Show=9/14/2001&idMessage=8296
There’s also a link in there to the (MS)NBC footage –
go to the bottom of this page, and click on
“Worldwide reaction to the attacks – 9/11/2001” (not the later reports). I can’t seem to view this, however, so someone else will have to see what’s there :
Now, none of this evidence means CNN didn’t do it, but so far, the burden of proof is on their accusers.